Sensitivity of seismic response of pile-supported, multi-span viaduct bridges to interaction between soil-foundation and structural parameters

被引:4
作者
Chaudhary, Muhammad Tariq A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Univ, Coll Engn & Petr, Dept Civil Engn, Shadadiya Campus, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Bridge FEM model; Soil-structure interaction; Seismic response; Pier column inelasticity; Pile foundation; Sensitivity analysis; INELASTIC DYNAMIC-ANALYSIS; GROUND-MOTION; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; IDENTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; CONTINUUM; MODEL; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1007/s41062-023-01145-2
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Soil-structure interaction (SSI) in pile-supported bridges coupled with non-linear behavior of the structural bridge elements is a complex problem. A sub-structuring technique that accounted for the kinematic and inertial SSI effects and non-linear finite element method (FEM) numerical model in the software SAP2000 were employed to investigate the response of a typical 4-span continuous bridge in two orthogonal directions founded in five soil profiles belonging to AASHTO site classes C and D. The FEM analysis results were disaggregated to delineate the effect of SSI and pier column inelasticity (PCI) on three output quantities, i.e., bridge deck acceleration (A), bridge displacement (delta), and pier column shear force (V). Sensitivity analysis, conducted using Morris method, ascertained the influence of SSI and PCI on the output quantities. It was revealed that all three response quantities were more sensitive to PCI in both orthogonal directions in all soil profiles compared to SSI. However, sensitivity of the response quantities to SSI was significant in the transverse bridge direction in all but one soil profile, which was explained through a lumped parameter model. Contrary to the current AASHTO code requirement, the inclusion of SSI for the design of pile-supported bridges in all seismic design categories (SDCs) is recommended for the bridge typology studied herein.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Ali W., 2018, SOIL STRUCTURE INTER
[2]   Evaluation of seismic response of inelastic structures considering soil-structure interaction [J].
Anand, Vishwajit ;
Kumar, S. R. Satish .
INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2021, 6 (02)
[3]   Seismic Soil-structure Interaction: A State-of-the-Art Review [J].
Anand, Vishwajit ;
Kumar, S. R. Satish .
STRUCTURES, 2018, 16 :317-326
[4]   Seismic analysis of motorway bridges accounting for key structural components and nonlinear soil-structure interaction [J].
Anastasopoulos, I. ;
Sakellariadis, L. ;
Agalianos, A. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 78 :127-141
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022: Our World at Risk: Transforming Governance for a Resilient Future
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, HYOGO FRAMEWORK ACTI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, V9th
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction 2015 -2030
[9]   Updating the neural network sediment load models using different sensitivity analysis methods: a regional application [J].
Asheghi, Reza ;
Hosseini, Seyed Abbas ;
Saneie, Mojtaba ;
Shahri, Abbas Abbaszadeh .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2020, 22 (03) :562-577
[10]   Comparing the performance of substructure and direct methods to estimate the effect of SSI on seismic response of mid-rise structures [J].
Asli, Sahand Jabini ;
Saffari, Hamed ;
Zahedi, Mohammad Javad ;
Saadatinezhad, Maryam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 15 (01) :81-94