In Vitro Activities of Ceftobiprole, Dalbavancin, Tedizolid and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Associated with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

被引:7
作者
Maraki, Sofia [1 ]
Mavromanolaki, Viktoria Eirini [2 ]
Stafylaki, Dimitra [1 ]
Iliaki-Giannakoudaki, Evangelia [1 ]
Hamilos, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Heraklion, Dept Clin Microbiol & Microbial Pathogenesis, Iraklion 71110, Greece
[2] Univ Crete, Sch Med, PC-71003 Iraklion, Greece
来源
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
skin and soft tissue infections; methicillin-resistant S. aureus; ceftobiprole; dalbavancin; tedizolid; ACUTE BACTERIAL SKIN; COMPLICATED SKIN; REDUCED SUSCEPTIBILITY; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; MRSA SKIN; EPIDEMIOLOGY; VANCOMYCIN; COMMUNITY; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/antibiotics12050900
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are associated with significant morbidity and healthcare costs, especially when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Vancomycin is a preferred antimicrobial therapy for the management of complicated SSTIs (cSSTIs) caused by MRSA, with linezolid and daptomycin regarded as alternative therapeutic options. Due to the increased rates of antimicrobial resistance in MRSA, several new antibiotics with activity against MRSA have been recently introduced in clinical practice, including ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, and tedizolid. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the aforementioned antibiotics against 124 clinical isolates of MRSA obtained from consecutive patients with SSTIs during the study period (2020-2022). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, linezolid and tedizolid were evaluated by the MIC Test Strip using Liofilchem strips. We found that when compared to the in vitro activity of vancomycin (MIC90 = 2 mu g/mL), dalbavancin possessed the lowest MIC90 (MIC90 = 0.094 mu g/mL), followed by tedizolid (MIC90 = 0.38 mu g/mL), linezolid, ceftobiprole, and daptomycin (MIC90 = 1 mu g/mL). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC50 and MIC90 values compared to vancomycin (0.064 vs. 1 and 0.094 vs. 2, respectively). Tedizolid exhibited an almost threefold greater level of in vitro activity than linezolid, and also had superior in vitro activity compared to ceftobiprole, daptomycin and vancomycin. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were detected among 71.8% of the isolates. In conclusion, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin and tedizolid exhibited potent activity against MRSA and are promising antimicrobials in the management of SSTIs caused by MRSA.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[21]   Prevalence, Severity, and Treatment of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (CA-MRSA) Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in 10 Medical Clinics in Texas: A South Texas Ambulatory Research Network (STARNet) Study [J].
Forcade, Nicolas A. ;
Parchman, Michael L. ;
Jorgensen, James H. ;
Du, Liem C. ;
Nyren, Natalie R. ;
Trevino, Lucina B. ;
Peña, Joel ;
Mann, Michael W. ;
Muñoz, Abilio ;
Trevino, Sylvia B. ;
Mortensen, Eric M. ;
Wickes, Brian L. ;
Pollock, Brad H. ;
Frei, Christopher R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (05) :543-550
[22]   Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole, a novel anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cephalosporin, tested against contemporary pathogens:: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2005-2006) [J].
Fritsche, Thomas R. ;
Sader, Helio S. ;
Jones, Ronald N. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2008, 61 (01) :86-95
[23]   Current management of patients hospitalized with complicated skin and soft tissue infections across Europe (2010-2011): assessment of clinical practice patterns and real-life effectiveness of antibiotics from the REACH study [J].
Garau, J. ;
Ostermann, H. ;
Medina, J. ;
Avila, M. ;
McBride, K. ;
Blasi, F. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2013, 19 (09) :E377-E385
[24]   Antibacterial Activity of Tedizolid, a Novel Oxazolidinone Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Hasannejad-Bibalan, Meysam ;
Mojtahedi, Ali ;
Biglari, Haniyeh ;
Halaji, Mehrdad ;
Ebrahim-Saraie, Hadi Sedigh .
MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 2019, 25 (09) :1330-1337
[25]   Susceptibility of ceftobiprole against Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates from 2019 from different European territories [J].
Hawser, Stephen ;
Kothari, Nimmi ;
Jemmely, Noelle ;
Redder, Nowel .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2022, 29 :393-397
[26]   Surveillance of omadacycline activity tested against clinical isolates from the United States and Europe: Results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme, 2017 [J].
Huband, Michael D. ;
Pfaller, Michael A. ;
Shortridge, Dee ;
Flamm, Robert K. .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2019, 19 :56-63
[27]   A Six-Year Retrospective Study of Microbiological Characteristics and Antimicrobial Resistance in Specimens from a Tertiary Hospital's Surgical Ward [J].
Ioannou, Petros ;
Maraki, Sofia ;
Koumaki, Dimitra ;
Manios, Georgios A. A. ;
Koumaki, Vasiliki ;
Kassotakis, Dimitrios ;
Zacharopoulos, Georgios V. V. ;
Kofteridis, Diamantis P. P. ;
Manios, Andreas ;
de Bree, Eelco .
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (03)
[28]   High vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and clinical outcomes in adults with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a meta-analysis [J].
Jacob, Jesse T. ;
DiazGranados, Carlos A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 17 (02) :E93-E100
[29]   Tedizolid and Linezolid for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections of the Lower Extremity versus Non-Lower-Extremity Infections Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Trials [J].
Joseph, Warren S. ;
Culshaw, Darren ;
Anuskiewicz, Steven ;
De Anda, Carisa ;
Prokocimer, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 107 (04) :264-271
[30]   Beyond Vancomycin: The Tail of the Lipoglycopeptides [J].
Klinker, Kenneth P. ;
Borgert, Samuel J. .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 37 (12) :2619-2636