In Vitro Activities of Ceftobiprole, Dalbavancin, Tedizolid and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Associated with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

被引:7
作者
Maraki, Sofia [1 ]
Mavromanolaki, Viktoria Eirini [2 ]
Stafylaki, Dimitra [1 ]
Iliaki-Giannakoudaki, Evangelia [1 ]
Hamilos, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Heraklion, Dept Clin Microbiol & Microbial Pathogenesis, Iraklion 71110, Greece
[2] Univ Crete, Sch Med, PC-71003 Iraklion, Greece
来源
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
skin and soft tissue infections; methicillin-resistant S. aureus; ceftobiprole; dalbavancin; tedizolid; ACUTE BACTERIAL SKIN; COMPLICATED SKIN; REDUCED SUSCEPTIBILITY; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; MRSA SKIN; EPIDEMIOLOGY; VANCOMYCIN; COMMUNITY; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/antibiotics12050900
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are associated with significant morbidity and healthcare costs, especially when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Vancomycin is a preferred antimicrobial therapy for the management of complicated SSTIs (cSSTIs) caused by MRSA, with linezolid and daptomycin regarded as alternative therapeutic options. Due to the increased rates of antimicrobial resistance in MRSA, several new antibiotics with activity against MRSA have been recently introduced in clinical practice, including ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, and tedizolid. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the aforementioned antibiotics against 124 clinical isolates of MRSA obtained from consecutive patients with SSTIs during the study period (2020-2022). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, linezolid and tedizolid were evaluated by the MIC Test Strip using Liofilchem strips. We found that when compared to the in vitro activity of vancomycin (MIC90 = 2 mu g/mL), dalbavancin possessed the lowest MIC90 (MIC90 = 0.094 mu g/mL), followed by tedizolid (MIC90 = 0.38 mu g/mL), linezolid, ceftobiprole, and daptomycin (MIC90 = 1 mu g/mL). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC50 and MIC90 values compared to vancomycin (0.064 vs. 1 and 0.094 vs. 2, respectively). Tedizolid exhibited an almost threefold greater level of in vitro activity than linezolid, and also had superior in vitro activity compared to ceftobiprole, daptomycin and vancomycin. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were detected among 71.8% of the isolates. In conclusion, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin and tedizolid exhibited potent activity against MRSA and are promising antimicrobials in the management of SSTIs caused by MRSA.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Severe surgical site infection in community hospitals: Epidemiology, key procedures, and the changing prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus [J].
Anderson, Deverick J. ;
Sexton, Daniel J. ;
Kanafani, Zeina A. ;
Auten, Grace ;
Kaye, Keith S. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 28 (09) :1047-1053
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, M02 CLSI, V13th
[3]   Evaluation of tedizolid against Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin or linezolid [J].
Barber, Katie E. ;
Smith, Jordan R. ;
Raut, Animesh ;
Rybak, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 71 (01) :152-155
[4]   Ceftobiprole: a novel cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [J].
Barboura, April ;
Schmidt, Stephan ;
Rand, Kenneth H. ;
Derendorf, Hartmut .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2009, 34 (01) :1-7
[5]   In vitro activity of tedizolid against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in 2013 and 2014 from sites in Latin American countries, Australia, New Zealand, and China [J].
Biedenbach, D. J. ;
Bouchillon, S. K. ;
Johnson, B. ;
Alder, J. ;
Sahm, D. F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 35 (12) :1933-1939
[6]   MRSA infections among patients in the emergency department: a European multicentre study [J].
Bouchiat, C. ;
Curtis, S. ;
Spiliopoulou, I. ;
Bes, M. ;
Cocuzza, C. ;
Codita, I. ;
Dupieux, C. ;
Giormezis, N. ;
Kearns, A. ;
Laurent, F. ;
Molinos, S. ;
Musumeci, R. ;
Prat, C. ;
Saadatian-Elahi, M. ;
Tacconelli, E. ;
Tristan, A. ;
Schulte, B. ;
Vandenesch, F. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (02) :372-375
[7]   Therapeutic Strategies To Counteract Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA Biofilm-Associated Infections [J].
Cascioferro, Stella ;
Carbone, Daniela ;
Parrino, Barbara ;
Pecoraro, Camilla ;
Giovannetti, Elisa ;
Cirrincione, Girolamo ;
Diana, Patrizia .
CHEMMEDCHEM, 2021, 16 (01) :65-80
[8]   Anti-MRSA Cephalosporin versus Vancomycin-Based Treatment for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Chen, Ching-Yi ;
Chen, Wang-Chun ;
Lai, Chih-Cheng ;
Shih, Tzu-Ping ;
Tang, Hung-Jen .
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (08)
[9]   Comparative in vitro activities of dalbavancin and seven comparator agents against 41 Staphylococcus species cultured from osteomyelitis infections and 18 VISA and hVISA strains [J].
Citron, Diane M. ;
Tyrrell, Kerin L. ;
Goldstein, Ellie J. C. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2014, 79 (04) :438-440
[10]   Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin [J].
Cosgrove, SE ;
Carroll, KC ;
Perl, TM .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (04) :539-545