Sustainable Systems Engineering Using Life Cycle Assessment: Application of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Agro-Environmental Footprint

被引:13
|
作者
Kashka, Faezeh Mohammadi [1 ]
Sarvestani, Zeinolabedin Tahmasebi [1 ]
Pirdashti, Hemmatollah [2 ]
Motevali, Ali [3 ]
Nadi, Mehdi [4 ]
Valipour, Mohammad [5 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agron, Tehran 1411713116, Iran
[2] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Genet & Agr Biotechnol Inst Tabarestan, Dept Agron, Sari 6898448181, Iran
[3] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Biosyst Engn, Sari 6898448181, Iran
[4] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Water Engn, Sari 6898448181, Iran
[5] Metropolitan State Univ Denver, Dept Engn & Engn Technol, Denver, CO 80217 USA
关键词
ANFIS-FCM algorithm; climate change; environmental damage; human health; LCA; soybean; sustainable systems engineering; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; METHODOLOGY; CONSUMPTION; STRATEGIES; PROVINCE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3390/su15076326
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increase in population has increased the need for agricultural and food products, and thus agricultural production should be increased. This goal may cause increases in emissions and environmental impacts by increasing the consumption of agricultural inputs. The prediction of environmental impacts plays an important role in evaluating pollutant emissions in crop production. This study employed two artificial intelligence (AI) methods: the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-fuzzy c-means (ANFIS-FCM) algorithm as a novel computational method, and an artificial neural network (ANN) as a conventional computational method to predict the environmental impacts of soybean production in different scenarios (i.e., soybean cultivation after rapeseed (R-S), wheat (W-S), and fallow (F-S)). The life cycle of soybean production was assessed in terms of environmental impacts through the IMPACT2002+ method in SimaPro. In the present study, the production of one ton of soybeans was considered the functional unit, and the boundary of the system was considered the gate of the field. According to the results, the production of each ton of soybean in the defined scenarios resulted in 0.0009 to 0.0016 DALY, 5476.18 to 8799.80 MJ primary, 1033.68 to 1840.70 PDF x m(2) x yr, and 563.55 to 880.61 kg CO2-eq damage to human health, resources, ecosystem quality, and climate change, respectively. Moreover, the weighted analysis indicated that various soybean production scenarios led to 293.87-503.73 mPt damage to the environment, in which the R-S scenario had the best environmental performance. According to the results, the ANFIS-FCM algorithm acted as the best prediction model of environmental indicators for soybean cultivation in all cases related to the ANN. The range of calculated R-2 for the ANFIS-FCM and ANN models were between 0.9967 to 0.9989 and 0.9269 to 0.9870, respectively. It can be concluded that the proposed ANFIS-FCM model is an efficient technique for obtaining accurate environmental prediction parameters of soybean cultivation.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [11] Environmental Footprint Neutrality Using Methods and Tools for Natural Capital Accounting in Life Cycle Assessment
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Osset, Philippe
    Blanc, Olivier
    Benetto, Enrico
    LAND, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [12] Evaluation of sustainable urban mobility using comparative environmental life cycle assessment: A case study of Qatar
    Al-Thawadi, Fatima E.
    Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 1
  • [13] Environmental impact prediction of microalgae to biofuels chains using artificial intelligence: A life cycle perspective
    Mayol, A. P.
    San Juan, J. L. G.
    Sybingco, E.
    Bandala, A.
    Dadios, E.
    Ubando, A. T.
    Culaba, A. B.
    Chen, W. H.
    Chang, J. S.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND GREEN TECHNOLOGY 2019, 2020, 463
  • [14] Integration of artificial intelligence methods and life cycle assessment to predict energy output and environmental impacts of paddy production
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid
    Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 631-632 : 1279 - 1294
  • [15] Application of Life Cycle Assessment in the Environmental Study of Sustainable Ceramic Bricks Made with 'alperujo' (Olive Pomace)
    Lopez-Garcia, Ana B.
    Cotes-Palomino, Teresa
    Uceda-Rodriguez, Manuel
    Moreno-Maroto, Jose Manuel
    Cobo-Ceacero, Carlos Javier
    Andreola, N. M. Fernanda
    Martinez-Garcia, Carmen
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05): : 1 - 16
  • [16] The environmental impacts of commercial poultry production systems using life cycle assessment: a review
    Kheiralipour, Kamran
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Karimi, Mahmoud
    Nadimi, Mohammad
    Paliwal, Jitendra
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 80 (01) : 33 - 54
  • [17] Environmental life cycle, carbon footprint and comparative economic assessment of rainwater harvesting systems in schools - a South African case study
    Maharaj, Praval
    Friedrich, Elena
    WATER SA, 2024, 50 (01) : 80 - 91
  • [18] Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: Carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using Life Cycle Assessment
    Gonzalez-Quintero, Ricardo
    Maria Bolivar-Vergara, Diana
    Chirinda, Ngonidzashe
    Arango, Jacobo
    Pantevez, Heiber
    Barahona-Rosales, Rolando
    Solange Sanchez-Pinzon, Maria
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 773
  • [19] Comparison of environmental loads with rail track systems using simplified life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Lee, C. K.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Kim, Y. K.
    URBAN TRANSPORT XIV: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2008, 101 : 367 - 372
  • [20] Environmental impact evaluation of conventional, organic and organic-plus poultry production systems using life cycle assessment
    Boggia, A.
    Paolotti, L.
    Castellini, C.
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2010, 66 (01) : 95 - 114