Sustainable Systems Engineering Using Life Cycle Assessment: Application of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Agro-Environmental Footprint

被引:13
|
作者
Kashka, Faezeh Mohammadi [1 ]
Sarvestani, Zeinolabedin Tahmasebi [1 ]
Pirdashti, Hemmatollah [2 ]
Motevali, Ali [3 ]
Nadi, Mehdi [4 ]
Valipour, Mohammad [5 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agron, Tehran 1411713116, Iran
[2] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Genet & Agr Biotechnol Inst Tabarestan, Dept Agron, Sari 6898448181, Iran
[3] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Biosyst Engn, Sari 6898448181, Iran
[4] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Water Engn, Sari 6898448181, Iran
[5] Metropolitan State Univ Denver, Dept Engn & Engn Technol, Denver, CO 80217 USA
关键词
ANFIS-FCM algorithm; climate change; environmental damage; human health; LCA; soybean; sustainable systems engineering; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; METHODOLOGY; CONSUMPTION; STRATEGIES; PROVINCE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3390/su15076326
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increase in population has increased the need for agricultural and food products, and thus agricultural production should be increased. This goal may cause increases in emissions and environmental impacts by increasing the consumption of agricultural inputs. The prediction of environmental impacts plays an important role in evaluating pollutant emissions in crop production. This study employed two artificial intelligence (AI) methods: the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-fuzzy c-means (ANFIS-FCM) algorithm as a novel computational method, and an artificial neural network (ANN) as a conventional computational method to predict the environmental impacts of soybean production in different scenarios (i.e., soybean cultivation after rapeseed (R-S), wheat (W-S), and fallow (F-S)). The life cycle of soybean production was assessed in terms of environmental impacts through the IMPACT2002+ method in SimaPro. In the present study, the production of one ton of soybeans was considered the functional unit, and the boundary of the system was considered the gate of the field. According to the results, the production of each ton of soybean in the defined scenarios resulted in 0.0009 to 0.0016 DALY, 5476.18 to 8799.80 MJ primary, 1033.68 to 1840.70 PDF x m(2) x yr, and 563.55 to 880.61 kg CO2-eq damage to human health, resources, ecosystem quality, and climate change, respectively. Moreover, the weighted analysis indicated that various soybean production scenarios led to 293.87-503.73 mPt damage to the environment, in which the R-S scenario had the best environmental performance. According to the results, the ANFIS-FCM algorithm acted as the best prediction model of environmental indicators for soybean cultivation in all cases related to the ANN. The range of calculated R-2 for the ANFIS-FCM and ANN models were between 0.9967 to 0.9989 and 0.9269 to 0.9870, respectively. It can be concluded that the proposed ANFIS-FCM model is an efficient technique for obtaining accurate environmental prediction parameters of soybean cultivation.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Using life cycle assessment in environmental engineering education
    Burnley, Stephen
    Wagland, Stuart
    Longhurst, Phil
    HIGHER EDUCATION PEDAGOGIES, 2019, 4 (01) : 64 - 79
  • [2] Environmental Life Cycle Assessment in Organic and Conventional Rice Farming Systems: Using a Cradle to Farm Gate Approach
    Amirahmadi, Elnaz
    Moudry, Jan
    Konvalina, Petr
    Hortenhuber, Stefan Josef
    Ghorbani, Mohammad
    Neugschwandtner, Reinhard W.
    Jiang, Zhixiang
    Krexner, Theresa
    Kopecky, Marek
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [3] Environmental Impacts of Biodiesel Production Cycle from Farm to Manufactory: An Application of Sustainable Systems Engineering
    Motevali, Ali
    Hooshmandzadeh, Niusha
    Fayyazi, Ebrahim
    Valipour, Mohammad
    Yue, Jun
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (02)
  • [4] Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production
    Kaab, Ali
    Sharifi, Mohammad
    Mobli, Hossein
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 664 : 1005 - 1019
  • [5] Examining energy use efficiency and conducting an environmental life cycle assessment through the application of artificial intelligence: A case study on the production of cumin and fennel
    Mirzaei, Jahangir
    Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami
    Zamani, Davood Mohammad
    Afshari, Hamed
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 20
  • [6] The EU Bioeconomy Footprint: Using life cycle assessment to monitor environmental impacts of the EU Bioeconomy
    Sinkko, Taija
    Sanye-Mengual, Esther
    Corrado, Sara
    Giuntoli, Jacopo
    Sala, Serenella
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 37 : 169 - 179
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment of a wastewater treatment plant in an urban area using the environmental footprint method
    Gomez, Sanjuana Rodriguez
    Castillo, Nahum Andres Medellin
    Orozco, Israel Herrera
    Galarza, Alfredo Avila
    Larragoitia, Sergio Arturo Castro
    Flores, Miguel Mauricio Aguilera
    Vazquez, Veronica avila
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 27 (4) : 9145 - 9163
  • [8] Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment
    Llorens, Berta
    Pomar, Candido
    Goyette, Bernard
    Rajagopal, Rajinikanth
    Andretta, Ines
    Latorre, Maria Angeles
    Remus, Aline
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102
  • [9] Optimal environmental design of nitrogen application rate for facultative wheat using life cycle assessment
    Bernas, Jaroslav
    Koppensteiner, Lukas J.
    Ticha, Marie
    Kaul, Hans-Peter
    Klimek-Kopyra, Agnieszka
    Euteneuer, Pia
    Moitzi, Gerhard
    Neugschwandtner, Reinhard W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2023, 146
  • [10] Sustainable Environmental Management using Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Model in Petrochemical Industry
    Maleki, R.
    Atabi, F.
    Jozi, S. A.
    Arjomandi, R.
    Mansouri, N.
    POLLUTION, 2020, 6 (02): : 337 - 351