Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Early Detection Program in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

被引:3
作者
Yeong, Siew Wei [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Sit Wai [3 ]
Ong, Siew Chin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Discipline Social & Adm Pharm, George Town, Malaysia
[2] UCSI Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Minist Hlth Malaysia, Med Dev Div, Malaysian Hlth Technol Assessment Sect, Putrajaya, Malaysia
关键词
breast neoplasm; cost-effectiveness analysis; early detection of cancer; low-and middle-income countries; SCREENING-PROGRAM; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2023.01.006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This review explores the cost-effectiveness of the strategies used in the breast cancer early detection programs of low-to middle-income countries.Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify related studies, published up to August 2021, on PubMed, Cochrane, ProQuest, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol were referenced during the reporting process. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 criteria were used to assess the requirements of the selected studies. Articles with original data and full texts were included in the review. Non-low-to middle-income countries and non-English articles were excluded. Results: This review identified 12 suitable studies, wherein 6 investigated the cost-effectiveness of clinical breast examinations (CBEs), whereas 10 looked into mammogram (MMG) with or without CBE. In 2 studies, the cost-effectiveness of raising awareness through mass media and the use of ultrasounds combined with CBE were investigated. Although cost-effective, MMG incurs greater costs and requires more skill to be performed. MMG screenings before the age of 40 years were not cost-effective. The limitations of this review include variability in the methodological approaches of its selected studies. Most of the chosen studies met the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 criteria. Conclusions: This review shows that adopting an age-and risk-based MMG screening approach could be viable in countries with limited resources. Future cost-effectiveness analysis research should include a section on patient and stakeholder engagement with the study's results.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 68
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Survival Rate of Breast Cancer Patients In Malaysia: A Population-based Study [J].
Abdullah, Nor Aini ;
Mahiyuddin, Wan Rozita Wan ;
Muhammad, Nor Asiah ;
Ali, Zainudin Mohamad ;
Ibrahim, Lailanor ;
Tamim, Nor Saleha Ibrahim ;
Mustafa, Amal Nasir ;
Kamaluddin, Muhammad Amir .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (08) :4591-4594
[2]   Econometric estimation of country-specific hospital costs [J].
Taghreed Adam ;
David B Evans ;
Christopher JL Murray .
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 1 (1)
[3]   Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries [J].
Al-Foheidi, Meteb ;
Al-Mansour, Mubarak M. ;
Ibrahim, Ezzeldin M. .
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 30 (02)
[4]  
[Anonymous], GLOB ACT PLAN PREV C
[5]  
[Anonymous], WHO guide to cost effectiveness analysis?
[6]  
[Anonymous], WHO GETS NEW ADV CUR
[7]  
[Anonymous], MAL NAT CANC REG REP
[8]  
[Anonymous], CANC SURV ENGL AD ST
[9]  
Arnold R. J. G., 2021, PHARMACOECONOMICS TH
[10]  
Barfar E, 2014, ARCH IRAN MED, V17, P241, DOI 014174/AIM.005