Characterizing Hydrogen Storage Potential in US Underground Gas Storage Facilities

被引:36
作者
Lackey, Greg [1 ,2 ]
Freeman, Gerad M. M. [3 ]
Buscheck, Thomas A. A. [4 ]
Haeri, Foad [1 ,2 ]
White, Joshua A. A. [4 ]
Huerta, Nicolas [3 ]
Goodman, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Energy Technol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
[2] NETL Support Contractor, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
[3] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA USA
[4] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
underground hydrogen storage; hydrogen energy; energy storage; energy transition; SUBSURFACE; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1029/2022GL101420
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Underground hydrogen storage is a long-duration energy storage option for a low-carbon economy. Although research into the technical feasibility of underground hydrogen storage is ongoing, existing underground gas storage (UGS) facilities are appealing candidates for the technology because of their ability to store and deliver natural gas. We estimate that UGS facilities in the United States (U.S.) can store 327 TWh (9.8 MMT) of pure hydrogen. A complete transition to hydrogen storage would reduce the collective working-gas energy of UGS facilities by similar to 75%; however, most (73.2%) UGS facilities could maintain current energy demand using a 20% hydrogen-natural gas blend. U.S. UGS facilities can buffer 23.9%-44.6% of the high and low hydrogen demand projected for 2050, respectively, which exceeds the current percentage of natural gas demand buffered by storage. Thus, transitioning UGS infrastructure to hydrogen could substantially reduce the number of new hydrogen storage facilities needed to support a hydrogen economy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Seasonal storage of hydrogen in a depleted natural gas reservoir
    Amid, A.
    Mignard, D.
    Wilkinson, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (12) : 5549 - 5558
  • [2] Where does hydrogen fit in a sustainable energy economy?
    Andrews, John
    Shabani, Bahman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONGRESS 2012, 2012, 49 : 15 - 25
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Annual Energy Outlook 2017 with projections to 2050
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, DOE/NNSA Vendor Communication Plan
  • [5] Quantifying induced effects of subsurface renewable energy storage
    Bauer, Sebastian
    Pfeiffer, Tilmann
    Boockmeyer, Anke
    Dahmke, Andreas
    Beyer, Christof
    [J]. EUROPEAN GEOSCIENCES UNION GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2015 - DIVISION ENERGY, RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, EGU 2015, 2015, 76 : 633 - 641
  • [6] Dolan C., 2020, ROAD MAP US HYDROGEN
  • [7] Microbial side effects of underground hydrogen storage - Knowledge gaps, risks and opportunities for successful implementation
    Dopffel, Nicole
    Jansen, Stefan
    Gerritse, Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (12) : 8594 - 8606
  • [8] EIA, 2021, UND NAT GAS WORK STO
  • [9] EIA, 2015, NAT GAS STOR REG
  • [10] Ennis-King J, 2021, Underground storage of hydrogen: mapping out the options for Australia