Climate change education in the South Pacific: Resilience for whom?

被引:3
作者
Takinana, Anuantaeka [1 ]
Baars, Roger C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Global Environm Studies, Sakyo Ku, Yoshida Honmachi, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
关键词
climate change education; community resilience; curriculum development; higher education; South Pacific; vocational learning; CHANGE ADAPTATION; SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; MITIGATION; UNIVERSITIES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1111/apv.12358
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Climate change education (CCE) can be an important tool to increase local community resilience. In 2017, the Pacific Community ratified the Framework for Resilient Development in the Pacific (FRDP) aiming to equip local communities with skills needed to become more climate change resilient. In 2018, Fiji implemented the Climate Change Resilience Programme (CCRP) at the University of the South Pacific (USP), the first of its kind in the South Pacific. This paper evaluates (i) the orientation and aim of the programme and (ii) how different stakeholders influenced the curriculum development process. Tribe's concept of curriculum space is used to highlight the overall aim of the CCRP. Freeman's stakeholder theory allows to identify key stakeholders and their influence on the curriculum. Results indicate that the programme seems to foster climate resilience in the workplace rather than the local community. Unfortunately, current and future community leaders, the notional targets of this course, were almost completely unrepresented in the process to accredit the course, with the body responsible for accreditation being dominated by industry representatives. This study helps to inform the current review of the Regional Certificate Programme to realign it with its initially envisioned community focus.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 84
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ORGAN SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT, DOI [10.1142/p298, DOI 10.1142/P298]
[3]  
Burrows J., 1999, Contemporary Education, V70, P5
[4]   THE PHILOSOPHIC PRACTITIONER AND THE CURRICULUM SPACE [J].
Dredge, Dianne ;
Benckendorff, Pierre ;
Day, Michele ;
Gross, Michael J. ;
Walo, Maree ;
Weeks, Paul ;
Whitelaw, Paul .
ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (04) :2154-2176
[5]   How climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies can threaten or enhance the biodiversity of production forests: Insights from Sweden [J].
Felton, A. ;
Gustafsson, L. ;
Roberge, J. -M. ;
Ranius, T. ;
Hjaelten, J. ;
Rudolphi, J. ;
Lindbladh, M. ;
Weslien, J. ;
Rist, L. ;
Brunet, J. ;
Felton, A. M. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2016, 194 :11-20
[6]  
Fiji Higher Education Commission, 2016, POL IND STAND ADV CO
[7]   Handling climate change education at universities: an overview [J].
Filho, Walter Leal ;
Sima, Mihaela ;
Sharifi, Ayyoob ;
Luetz, Johannes M. ;
Salvia, Amanda Lange ;
Mifsud, Mark ;
Olooto, Felicia Motunrayo ;
Djekic, Ilija ;
Anholon, Rosley ;
Rampasso, Izabela ;
Donkor, Felix Kwabena ;
Dinis, Maria Alzira Pimenta ;
Klavins, Maris ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Chari, Martin Munashe ;
Molthan-Hill, Petra ;
Mifsud, Alexandra ;
Sen, Salil K. ;
Lokupitiya, Erandathie .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2021, 33 (01)
[8]   The Amenity Value of English Nature: A Hedonic Price Approach [J].
Gibbons, Stephen ;
Mourato, Susana ;
Resende, Guilherme M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 57 (02) :175-196
[9]   Facilitating local climate change adaptation through transnational municipal networks [J].
Fuenfgeld, Hartmut .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 12 :67-73
[10]   Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons [J].
Fuessel, H. -M. .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (02) :265-275