Effects of economic globalization, environment-related technology innovation, and industrial structure change on the ecological footprint of top 10 Asian technological innovation countries

被引:5
作者
Lu, Wen-Cheng [1 ]
Wang, Kuang-Hsien [1 ]
机构
[1] Ming Chuan Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, 5 De Ming Rd, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
关键词
Economic globalization; Ecological footprint; Industrial structure change; Environment-related technology innovation; GDP; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; CO2; EMISSIONS; PANEL; IMPACT; URBANIZATION; CONSUMPTION; DEGRADATION; GROWTH; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-024-00899-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study investigates how economic globalization, innovations in environment-related technology, shifts in industrial structure, and GDP collectively influence the ecological footprint of the top 10 Asian countries known for technological innovation from 1999 to 2018. Results show that economic globalization, industrial structure change, and GDP are important determinants of ecological footprint. Greater economic globalization and GDP growth harm the environment and require more resources. However, industrial structure change toward services ameliorates environment pressure. Uni-directional causality was established from globalization to ecological footprint, from ecological footprint to industrial structure change, and from GDP to industrial structure change. In addition, bidirectional causalities were also confirmed: between GDP and ecological footprint, between GDP and environment-related technology innovation, between economic globalization and GDP, and between environment-related technology innovation and ecological footprint. Finally, this study recommends that governments should enhance technological innovation, encourage industrial structure change towards high-value-added service industries, and use low-carbon energy in the pursuit of globalization. These results have notable implications for energy policy and economic sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 802
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Examining the role of financial inclusion towards CO2 emissions: presenting the role of renewable energy and globalization in the context of EKC
    Mehmood, Usman
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (11) : 15946 - 15954
  • [32] The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014
    Mensah, Claudia Nyarko
    Long, Xingle
    Boamah, Kofi Baah
    Bediako, Isaac Asare
    Dauda, Lamini
    Salman, Muhammed
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (29) : 29678 - 29698
  • [33] The impact of economic development on environmental degradation in Qatar
    Mrabet, Zouhair
    AlSamara, Mouyad
    Jarallah, Shaif Hezam
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2017, 24 (01) : 7 - 38
  • [34] Revisiting the N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve for economic complexity and ecological footprint
    Numan, Umar
    Ma, Benjiang
    Meo, Muhammad Saeed
    Bedru, Hayat Dino
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [35] The impact of green technological innovation and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in African countries
    Obobisa, Emma Serwaa
    Chen, Haibo
    Mensah, Isaac Adjei
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 180
  • [36] Okamoto S., 2013, J EC STRUCTURES, V2, P8, DOI DOI 10.1186/2193-2409-2-8
  • [37] Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis
    Pedroni, P
    [J]. ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2004, 20 (03) : 597 - 625
  • [38] Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships
    Pesaran, MH
    Shin, YC
    Smith, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2001, 16 (03) : 289 - 326
  • [39] Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels
    Pesaran, MH
    Shin, YC
    Smith, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) : 621 - 634
  • [40] Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy
    Popp, David
    Hascic, Ivan
    Medhi, Neelakshi
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (04) : 648 - 662