Prediction of Global Horizontal Irradiance Using an Explainable Data Driven Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:8
作者
Gupta, Rahul [1 ]
Yadav, Anil Kumar [2 ]
Jha, Shyama Kant [3 ]
机构
[1] Netaji Subhas Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, New Delhi, India
[2] Dr BR Ambedkar Natl Inst Technol Jalandhar, Dept Instrumentat & Control Engn, Jalandhar, Punjab, India
[3] Netaji Subhas Univ Technol, Dept Instrumentat & Control Engn, New Delhi, India
关键词
global horizontal irradiance; extra trees regressor; shapely additive explanation; variance inflation factor; estimation; SOLAR-RADIATION; RANDOM FOREST; REGRESSION; NETWORK; ERROR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/15325008.2024.2310771
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Estimating global horizontal irradiance (GHI) with a high level of accuracy and precision is very challenging due to the volatile climate parameters and location constraints. To overcome this challenge, several machine learning (ML)-based techniques such as Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Extra Trees (ET) are implemented to forecast the GHI. The first stage of model development is to select the optimal subset of features by using the variance inflation factor feature selection method. In the second stage, the selected features are fed into the ML models and trained. The predictive performance of the ML models is improved the result of removal of insignificant input features. The predictive accuracy of the ML models is compared and evaluated by performance metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R2). Conclusively, after feature selection it is seen that the ET algorithm outperforms the others because of its lowest MAE and RMSE value of 3.01 and 1.748, respectively, as compared to the other models, indicating its relevancy, legitimacy, and viability for the estimation of GHI. The higher R2 value of 0.99 obtained by the ET model indicates that it is best fitted with the dataset. Additionally, optimal shapely additive explanation values have been used as feature attributions for determining the magnitude and direction of the impact of each feature on the outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Predictive modelling for solar thermal energy systems: A comparison of support vector regression, random forest, extra trees and regression trees [J].
Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem ;
Reynolds, Jonathan ;
Rezgui, Yacine .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 :810-821
[2]  
Akinwande M. O., 2015, OPEN J STAT, V5, P754, DOI [10.4236/ojs.2015.57075, DOI 10.4236/OJS.2015.57075]
[3]  
Akossou AYJ., 2013, Int. J. Math. Comput, V20, P84
[4]   An artificial intelligence-based solar radiation prophesy model for green energy utilization in energy management system  [J].
Alassery, Fawaz ;
Alzahrani, Ahmed ;
Khan, Asif Irshad ;
Irshad, Kashif ;
Islam, Saiful .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 52
[5]   A Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Daily Solar Energy Forecasting Using Numerical Weather Models [J].
Aler, Ricardo ;
Martin, Ricardo ;
Valls, Jose M. ;
Galvan, Ines M. .
INTELLIGENT DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING VIII, 2015, 570 :269-278
[6]   Hyperparameter Search for Machine Learning Algorithms for Optimizing the Computational Complexity [J].
Ali, Yasser A. ;
Awwad, Emad Mahrous ;
Al-Razgan, Muna ;
Maarouf, Ali .
PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (02)
[7]  
[Anonymous], SOLAR RAD DATA
[8]   On the root mean square error (RMSE) calculation for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models: A novel exact analytical solution based on Lambert W function [J].
Calasan, Martin ;
Aleem, Shady H. E. Abdel ;
Zobaa, Ahmed F. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 210
[9]   A METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE GLOBAL SOLAR-RADIATION FROM METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE DATA [J].
CANO, D ;
MONGET, JM ;
ALBUISSON, M ;
GUILLARD, H ;
REGAS, N ;
WALD, L .
SOLAR ENERGY, 1986, 37 (01) :31-39
[10]   Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? - Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature [J].
Chai, T. ;
Draxler, R. R. .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 7 (03) :1247-1250