共 50 条
Introduction: The Politics of Abortion 50 Years after Roe
被引:6
|作者:
Kimport, Katrina
[1
]
Kreitzer, Rebecca
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词:
abortion;
siloization;
marginalization;
social sciences;
Roe v. Wade;
LABOR-FORCE PARTICIPATION;
UNITED-STATES;
POLICY;
WOMEN;
MOVEMENTS;
MORALITY;
STIGMA;
TERM;
CONSEQUENCES;
DISPARITIES;
D O I:
10.1215/03616878-10451382
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Abortion is central to the American political landscape and a common pregnancy outcome, yet research on abortion has been siloed and marginalized in the social sciences. In an empirical analysis, the authors found only 22 articles published in this century in the top economics, political science, and sociology journals. This special issue aims to bring abortion research into a more generalist space, challenging what the authors term "the abortion research paradox," wherein abortion research is largely absent from prominent disciplinary social science journals but flourishes in interdisciplinary and specialized journals. After discussing the misconceptions that likely contribute to abortion research siloization and the implications of this siloization for abortion research as well as social science knowledge more generally, the authors introduce the articles in this special issue. Then, in a call for continued and expanded research on abortion, the introduction to this special issue closes by offering three guiding practices for abortion scholars- both those new to the topic and those deeply familiar with it-in the hopes of building an ever-richer body of literature on abortion politics, policy, and law. The need for such a robust literature is especially acute following the US Supreme Court's June 2022 overturning of the constitutional right to abortion.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 484
页数:22
相关论文