Introduction: The Politics of Abortion 50 Years after Roe

被引:6
|
作者
Kimport, Katrina [1 ]
Kreitzer, Rebecca [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
abortion; siloization; marginalization; social sciences; Roe v. Wade; LABOR-FORCE PARTICIPATION; UNITED-STATES; POLICY; WOMEN; MOVEMENTS; MORALITY; STIGMA; TERM; CONSEQUENCES; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1215/03616878-10451382
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Abortion is central to the American political landscape and a common pregnancy outcome, yet research on abortion has been siloed and marginalized in the social sciences. In an empirical analysis, the authors found only 22 articles published in this century in the top economics, political science, and sociology journals. This special issue aims to bring abortion research into a more generalist space, challenging what the authors term "the abortion research paradox," wherein abortion research is largely absent from prominent disciplinary social science journals but flourishes in interdisciplinary and specialized journals. After discussing the misconceptions that likely contribute to abortion research siloization and the implications of this siloization for abortion research as well as social science knowledge more generally, the authors introduce the articles in this special issue. Then, in a call for continued and expanded research on abortion, the introduction to this special issue closes by offering three guiding practices for abortion scholars- both those new to the topic and those deeply familiar with it-in the hopes of building an ever-richer body of literature on abortion politics, policy, and law. The need for such a robust literature is especially acute following the US Supreme Court's June 2022 overturning of the constitutional right to abortion.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 484
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abortion after Roe
    Hall, Lesley A.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HISTORY, 2020, 32 (04) : 139 - 143
  • [2] Abortion after Roe
    Gordon, Linda
    DISSENT, 2016, 63 (02) : 137 - 142
  • [3] Abortion after Roe
    Prescott, Heather Munro
    JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE AND ALLIED SCIENCES, 2016, 71 (04) : 499 - 501
  • [4] Abortion after Roe
    Rothman, Barbara Katz
    SIGNS, 2018, 44 (01): : 255 - 258
  • [5] Abortion after Roe
    Lennerhed, Lena
    BULLETIN OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE, 2016, 90 (04) : 750 - 751
  • [6] Abortion after Roe
    Kluchin, Rebecca M.
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY, 2016, 103 (03) : 843 - 844
  • [7] Introduction: Histories of abortion beyond Roe
    Frydman, Hannah
    Reynolds, Melissa
    GENDER AND HISTORY, 2024, 36 (02): : 289 - 294
  • [8] Unintended Consequences: Abortion Training in the Years After Roe v Wade
    Aksel, Sarp
    Fein, Lydia
    Ketterer, Em
    Young, Emily
    Backus, Lois
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (03) : 404 - 407
  • [9] Abortion after "Roe."
    Nelson, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF SEXUALITY, 2017, 26 (01) : 151 - 152
  • [10] Abortion before & after Roe
    Joyce, Ted
    Tan, Ruoding
    Zhang, Yuxiu
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 32 (05) : 804 - 815