Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen gargle for postoperative pain after mandibular third molar extraction: A phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover trial

被引:1
|
作者
Ioroi, Takeshi [1 ]
Kakei, Yasumasa [2 ]
Ito, Takahiro [1 ]
Shirai, Tatsuya [2 ]
Okazaki, Yutaro [1 ]
Hasegawa, Takumi [2 ]
Akashi, Masaya [2 ]
Yano, Ikuko [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH | 2023年 / 9卷 / 06期
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
ibuprofen; molar; mouthwashes; postoperative pain; third; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SPLIT-MOUTH; ACETAMINOPHEN; TRISMUS; DICLOFENAC; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.821
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study was designed to evaluate the postoperative efficacy and safety of using an ibuprofen gargle as a pain management strategy for patients who have undergone mandibular third molar extraction. We also ensured that the quality of treatment was not compromised throughout the study.Material and MethodsPatients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: the ibuprofen-placebo (IP) group and the placebo-ibuprofen (PI) group. On postoperative Day (POD) 1, the IP group initiated ibuprofen administration, while the PI group started taking placebo. On POD 2, the IP group switched to using placebo, whereas the PI group switched to ibuprofen. From PODs 3-5, both groups were prescribed ibuprofen gargle. The primary endpoint was within-subject visual analog scale (VAS) score before and 5 min after the first use of the ibuprofen or placebo gargle on PODs 1 and 2 (Delta VAS5_ibuprofen - Delta VAS5_placebo). The incidence and severity of adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and a subjective rating scale.ResultsThis study enrolled 40 patients. The within-subject VAS5 of the IP and PI groups were 1.25 +/- 12.0 and -5.26 +/- 8.93 mm, respectively. The treatment effect of ibuprofen gargle was -2.01 +/- 10.62 mm (p = .246). None of the patients in each group presented with serious adverse events or clinically significant complications (including dry sockets) after extraction. Transient adverse events, such as throat tingling and oral discomfort (grade 1), were observed in each group.ConclusionIbuprofen gargle was safe but did not provide significant pain relief when used after mandibular third molar extraction.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1068
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perioperative Bromelain Reduces Pain and Swelling and Improves Quality of Life Measures After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Majid, Omer Waleed
    Al-Mashhadani, Bashar Adil
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (06) : 1043 - 1048
  • [22] Efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin in essential tremor: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial
    Ferrara, Joseph M.
    Kenney, Christopher
    Davidson, Anthony L.
    Shinawi, Lina
    Kissel, Abigail M.
    Jankovic, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 285 (1-2) : 195 - 197
  • [23] Intraoperative acupuncture for posttonsillectomy pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Tsao, Gabriel J.
    Messner, Anna H.
    Seybold, Jeannie
    Sayyid, Zahra N.
    Cheng, Alan G.
    Golianu, Brenda
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (08) : 1972 - 1978
  • [24] Postoperative pain after bupivacaine supplementation in mandibular third molar surgery: splint-mouth randomized double blind controlled clinical trial
    de Souza A.M.M.
    Horliana A.C.R.T.
    Simone J.L.
    Jorge W.A.
    Tortamano I.P.
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2014, 18 (4) : 387 - 391
  • [25] Postoperative analgesic efficacy of continuous wound infusion with local anesthetics after laparoscopy (PAIN): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Lee, Nae Hyun
    Ryu, Kyoungho
    Song, Taejong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (02): : 562 - 568
  • [26] The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Pain Following Abdominal Wall Reconstruction A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Fafaj, Aldo
    Krpata, David M.
    Petro, Clayton C.
    Prabhu, Ajita S.
    Rosenblatt, Steven
    Tastaldi, Luciano
    Alkhatib, Hemasat
    Tu, Chao
    Zolin, Samuel J.
    Thomas, Jonah D.
    Costanzo, Adele M.
    Rosen, Michael J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 276 (02) : 224 - 232
  • [27] Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in thoracolumbosacral spine operations: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial
    Aglio, Linda S.
    Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M.
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Kim, Grace Y.
    Zhou, Jie
    Gugino, Laverne D.
    Crossley, Lisa J.
    Gosnell, James L.
    Chi, John H.
    Groff, Michael W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 29 (06) : 647 - 653
  • [28] Postoperative analgesic efficacy of continuous wound infusion with local anesthetics after laparoscopy (PAIN): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Nae Hyun Lee
    Kyoungho Ryu
    Taejong Song
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 562 - 568
  • [29] Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction
    Victoria Olmedo-Gaya, Maria
    Javier Manzano-Moreno, Francisco
    Luis Munoz-Lopez, Jose
    Francisco Vallecillo-Capilla, Manuel
    Reyes-Botella, Candela
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (09) : 2981 - 2988
  • [30] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled, single dose trial of the safety and efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen for treatment of pain in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy
    Moss, Jonathan R.
    Watcha, Mehernoor F.
    Bendel, Laima P.
    McCarthy, Denise L.
    Witham, Stacy L.
    Glover, Chris D.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (05) : 483 - 489