Perceptual contrast reduces the judgments of learning of small-font words and increases the judgments of learning of large-font words compared with the no-contrast conditions

被引:0
作者
Wan, Bowen [1 ]
Zha, Jinlian [2 ]
Zheng, Xiaoqian [1 ]
Li, Haifeng [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Pingxiang Hlth Vocat Coll, Pingxiang, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Normal Univ, 1 Keji Rd, Fuzhou 350117, Peoples R China
关键词
font size; judgments of learning; memory; perceptual contrast; FLUENCY; SIZE; BELIEFS; MEMORY; RETRIEVAL; SALIENCE;
D O I
10.1002/pchj.679
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The font-size effect on judgments of learning (JOLs) refers to large-font words being rated as more memorable than small ones when required to predict memory performance during the study phase. This study examines perceptual contrast as the prerequisite for this font-size effect on JOLs and explores how perceptual contrast leads to this effect. In Experiment 1, perceptual contrast was achieved by inserting words with one font (e.g., 18 pt) into a series of words with another font (e.g., 70 pt) at a particular proportion (1:4). In Experiment 2, perceptual contrast was manipulated by presenting two different font words up and down in a pair. The results of both experiments showed that: (1) participants rated higher JOLs for large than small fonts under the contrast conditions, but the JOL difference between the two fonts was not significant under the no-contrast conditions; (2) the JOLs of small-font words under the contrast conditions was reduced compared with the no-contrast conditions, but the JOLs of large-font words under the contrast conditions was increased compared with the no-contrast conditions. These results indicated that perceptual contrast was the prerequisite for the font-size effect on JOLs. The reason for this effect is that, compared to no-contrast conditions, perceptual contrast reduces the JOLs of small-font words while increasing the JOLs of large-font words. This study may deepen researchers' understanding of the mechanism of the font-size effect on JOLs and help educators effectively guide students to learn.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 679
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Embodiment Meets Metamemory: Weight as a Cue for Metacognitive Judgments [J].
Alban, Michael W. ;
Kelley, Colleen M. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2013, 39 (05) :1628-1634
[2]   Age-Related Associative Memory Deficits in Value-Based Remembering: The Contribution of Agenda-Based Regulation and Strategy Use [J].
Ariel, Robert ;
Price, Jodi ;
Hertzog, Christopher .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2015, 30 (04) :795-808
[3]   Font Size Matters-Emotion and Attention in Cortical Responses to Written Words [J].
Bayer, Mareike ;
Sommer, Werner ;
Schacht, Annekathrin .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05)
[4]  
Bianchi R. G., 2021, EMOTIONAL RESPONSES, DOI [10.1145/3472301.3484325, DOI 10.1145/3472301.3484325]
[5]   Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions [J].
Bjork, Robert A. ;
Dunlosky, John ;
Kornell, Nate .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 :417-+
[6]   On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief [J].
Blake, Adam B. ;
Castel, Alan D. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 186 :27-38
[7]  
Brysbaert Marc, 2019, J Cogn, V2, P16, DOI 10.5334/joc.72
[8]   Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect [J].
Chang, Minyu ;
Brainerd, Charles J. .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2022, 17 (02) :443-476
[9]   Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): Effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Matvey, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (05) :1180-1191
[10]   Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect? [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Hunt, RR ;
Clark, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (03) :649-657