Diagnostic performance of US LI-RADS in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance

被引:0
|
作者
Abduljabbar, Ahmed Haitham [1 ,2 ]
Wazzan, Mohammad A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Surveillance; Liver cirrhosis; Ultrasound; Ultrasound LI-RADS; ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN MEASUREMENT; ULTRASOUND; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-023-01083-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundLiver cirrhosis and chronic infection with hepatitis B virus are major risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Guidelines recommend ultrasound (US) surveillance for population at risk of HCC. The US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) aims at standardization of interpretation, reporting, and management recommendations for US surveillance examinations. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of US LI-RADS in early HCC detection in patients at risk.ResultsThis retrospective study included patients with surveillance US between January 2018 and January 2020 who had a contrast-enhanced CT or MRI of the liver within 1 month from the date of US examination. Visualization scores and US categories were assigned according to the US LI-RADS lexicon. A total of 264 participants were eligible for the study. HCC was diagnosed in 33 participants. The US-3 category had a 39.4% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity for HCC detection. The US-2 category had a 45.4% sensitivity and 87% specificity for HCC detection. The visualization score C showed the highest number of HCC (19/33) and had the highest false-negative rate (76%, 13 of 17).ConclusionsBoth US-2 and US-3 categories showed high specificity and low sensitivity for HCC detection in the setting of surveillance of patients at high risk. Visualization score C had the highest risk for HCC and the highest rate of false-negative results. Intense surveillance by contrast-enhanced CT or MRI might be beneficial for patients with limited visualization scores B and C.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] US LI-RADS visualization score: diagnostic outcome of ultrasound-guided focal hepatic lesion biopsy in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kang, Ji Hun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, So Jung
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Kim, Pyo-Nyun
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2021, 40 (01) : 167 - 175
  • [32] Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI
    Patel, Richa
    Aslam, Anum
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Mervak, Benjamin
    Mubarak, Eman
    Higgins, Lily
    Lala, Kayli
    Conner, Jack F.
    Khaykin, Valerie
    Bashir, Mustafa
    Do, Richard Kinh Gian
    Burke, Lauren M. B.
    Smith, Elainea N.
    Kim, Charles Y.
    Shampain, Kimberly L.
    Owen, Dawn
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (06) : 1641 - 1654
  • [33] Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kim, Yeun-Yoon
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Yoon, Ja Kyung
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Roh, Yun Ho
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (03) : 484 - 493
  • [34] Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm
    Ania Kielar
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Sara Lewis
    Vahid Yaghmai
    Frank H. Miller
    Hooman Yarmohammadi
    Charles Kim
    Victoria Chernyak
    Takeshi Yokoo
    Jeffrey Meyer
    Isabel Newton
    Richard K. Do
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 218 - 230
  • [35] Differentiation between combined hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of diagnostic performance between ultrasomics-based model and CEUS LI-RADS v2017
    Li, Chao-qun
    Zheng, Xin
    Guo, Huan-ling
    Cheng, Mei-qing
    Huang, Yang
    Xie, Xiao-yan
    Lu, Ming-de
    Kuang, Ming
    Wang, Wei
    Chen, Li-da
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [36] HCC detection on surveillance US: Comparing focused liver protocol using US LI-RADS technical guidelines to a general complete abdominal US protocol
    da Silva, Priscila Henriques
    Gomes, Matheus Menezes
    Loureiro de Matos, Carla Adriana
    Silva, Ivonete Sandra
    Gonzalez, Adriano Miziara
    Torres, Ulysses S.
    Martinez Salazar, Gloria Maria
    D'Ippolito, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (11) : 2487 - 2495
  • [37] Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS in adult patients with rare hepatic tumors
    Granata, V
    Fusco, R.
    Setola, S. Venanzio
    Barretta, M. L.
    Iasevoli, D. M. A.
    Palaia, R.
    Belli, A.
    Patrone, R.
    Tatangelo, F.
    Grazzini, G.
    Grassi, R.
    Grassi, F.
    Anselmo, A.
    Izzo, F.
    Petrillo, A.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (02) : 399 - 414
  • [38] Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm
    Kielar, Ania
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Lewis, Sara
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    Miller, Frank H.
    Yarmohammadi, Hooman
    Kim, Charles
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Newton, Isabel
    Do, Richard K.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 218 - 230
  • [39] Expanding the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 diagnostic population: performance and reliability of LI-RADS for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver carcinoma in patients who do not meet strict LI-RADS high-risk criteria
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Cannella, Roberto
    Tsai, Richard
    Naeem, Muhammad
    LeBlanc, Maverick
    Salter, Amber
    Tsung, Allan
    Fleckenstein, Jaquelyn
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    HPB, 2019, 21 (12) : 1697 - 1706
  • [40] Feeding artery: a valuable feature for differentiation of regenerative nodule, dysplastic nodules and small hepatocellular carcinoma in CEUS LI-RADS
    Wu, Jiapeng
    Zhao, Qinxian
    Wang, Yuling
    Xiao, Fan
    Cai, Wenjia
    Liu, Sisi
    Du, Zhicheng
    Yu, Xiaoling
    Liu, Fangyi
    Yu, Jie
    Liang, Ping
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02) : 745 - 754