Integrating Organizational Climate Theory: A Domain-Independent Explanation for Climate Formation and Function

被引:10
作者
Beus, Jeremy M. [1 ,4 ]
Smith, Jacob H. [2 ]
Taylor, Erik C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst & Entrepreneurship, Pullman, WA USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Rucks Dept Management, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[3] East Carolina Univ, Dept Management, Greenville, NC USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst & Entrepreneurship, Todd Hall 437C,POB 644743, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
organizational climate; uncertainty; sensemaking; theory; organizational culture; PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE; SAFETY CLIMATE; CROSS-LEVEL; MULTILEVEL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; DIVERSITY CLIMATE; SERVICE CLIMATE; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1037/apl0001117
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Organizational climate is arguably the most studied representation of the social context of organizations, having been examined as an antecedent, outcome, or boundary condition in virtually every domain of inquiry in the organizational sciences. Yet there is no commonly recognized, domain-independent theory that is used to explain why and how climates both form and affect behavior. Rather, there is a set of climate theories (and literatures) housed across a variety of divergent content domains. As a result, researchers who study climate in one domain are often unaware of climate advancements made in another. This lack of a theoretical lingua franca for climate limits our ability to understand what is known about climate and how climate research-whether domain-specific or domain-independent-can progress in a more cogent fashion. To resolve these fractures and unify climate scholarship, this article integrates existing theoretical perspectives of climate into a singular climate theory that summarizes and articulates domain-independent answers to the questions of why and how climates form and influence behavior in organizations. Using the individual drive to reduce uncertainty in meaningful social settings as the motivational mortar for this theoretical integration, we offer a needed reorientation to the field and illuminate a path forward for both future domain-specific and domain-independent climate advancements.
引用
收藏
页码:2018 / 2039
页数:22
相关论文
共 190 条
[11]  
Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO
[12]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[13]  
Barchas P., 1986, ADV GROUP PROCESSES, V3rd, P209
[14]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[15]   THE THEORY OF PURPOSEFUL WORK BEHAVIOR: THE ROLE OF PERSONALITY, HIGHER-ORDER GOALS, AND JOB CHARACTERISTICS [J].
Barrick, Murray R. ;
Mount, Michael K. ;
Li, Ning .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (01) :132-153
[16]   When Managers and Their Teams Disagree: A Longitudinal Look at the Consequences of Differences in Perceptions of Organizational Support [J].
Bashshur, Michael R. ;
Hernandez, Ana ;
Gonzalez-Roma, Vicente .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 96 (03) :558-573
[17]  
Becker G. S., 1964, HUMAN CAPITAL
[18]  
Berger C.R., 1979, Language and social psychology, P122
[19]   HOW DO LEADERS AND THEIR TEAMS BRING ABOUT ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND OUTCOMES? [J].
Berson, Yair ;
Da'as, Rima'a ;
Waldman, David A. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) :79-108
[20]   Climate-Context Congruence: Examining Context as a Boundary Condition for Climate-Performance Relationships [J].
Beus, Jeremy M. ;
Taylor, Erik C. ;
Solomon, Shelby J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 106 (09) :1332-1356