Treatment Detection and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III Estimation Using Finger Tapping Tasks

被引:3
|
作者
ZhuParris, Ahnjili [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thijssen, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Elzinga, Willem O. O. [1 ]
Makai-Boloni, Soma [1 ,2 ]
Kraaij, Wessel [3 ]
Groeneveld, Geert J. J. [1 ,2 ]
Doll, Robert J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Human Drug Res CHDR, Zernikedreef 8, NL-2333 CL Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Inst Adv Comp Sci LIACS, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Parkinson's disease; finger tapping; Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; machine learning; classification; regression; FINE MOTOR; LEVODOPA; BRADYKINESIA; VALIDATION; FEATURES; LIMB;
D O I
10.1002/mds.29520
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The validation of objective and easy-to-implement biomarkers that can monitor the effects of fast-acting drugs among Parkinson's disease (PD) patients would benefit antiparkinsonian drug development. We developed composite biomarkers to detect levodopa/carbidopa effects and to estimate PD symptom severity. For this development, we trained machine learning algorithms to select the optimal combination of finger tapping task features to predict treatment effects and disease severity. Data were collected during a placebo-controlled, crossover study with 20 PD patients. The alternate index and middle finger tapping (IMFT), alternative index finger tapping (IFT), and thumb-index finger tapping (TIFT) tasks and the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III were performed during treatment. We trained classification algorithms to select features consisting of the MDS-UPDRS III item scores; the individual IMFT, IFT, and TIFT; and all three tapping tasks collectively to classify treatment effects. Furthermore, we trained regression algorithms to estimate the MDS-UPDRS III total score using the tapping task features individually and collectively. The IFT composite biomarker had the best classification performance (83.50% accuracy, 93.95% precision) and outperformed the MDS-UPDRS III composite biomarker (75.75% accuracy, 73.93% precision). It also achieved the best performance when the MDS-UPDRS III total score was estimated (mean absolute error: 7.87, Pearson's correlation: 0.69). We demonstrated that the IFT composite biomarker outperformed the combined tapping tasks and the MDS-UPDRS III composite biomarkers in detecting treatment effects. This provides evidence for adopting the IFT composite biomarker for detecting antiparkinsonian treatment effect in clinical trials. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1795 / 1805
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of the Slovak version of the Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)
    Skorvanek, M.
    Kosutzka, Z.
    Valkovic, P.
    Saeedian, R. Ghorbani
    Gdovinova, Z.
    LaPelle, N.
    Huang, J.
    Tilley, B. C.
    Stebbins, G. T.
    Goetz, C. G.
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2013, 76 (04) : 463 - 468
  • [22] Resolving Missing Data from the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale: Implications for Telemedicine
    Luo, Sheng
    Goetz, Christopher G.
    Choi, Dongrak
    Aggarwal, Sanket
    Mestre, Tiago A.
    Stebbins, Glenn T.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2022, 37 (08) : 1749 - 1755
  • [23] Ensemble deep model for continuous estimation of Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III
    Murtadha D. Hssayeni
    Joohi Jimenez-Shahed
    Michelle A. Burack
    Behnaz Ghoraani
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 20
  • [24] Using Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts 2 and 3 Simultaneously: Combining the Patient Voice with Clinician Ratings
    Guo, Yuanyuan
    Goetz, Christopher G.
    Stebbins, Glenn T.
    Mestre, Tiago A.
    Luo, Sheng
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2023, 38 (03) : 453 - 463
  • [25] Teaching Program for the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale: (MDS-UPDRS)
    Goetz, Christopher G.
    Stebbins, Glenn T.
    Chmura, Teresa A.
    Fahn, Stanley
    Poewe, Werner
    Tanner, Caroline M.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2010, 25 (09) : 1190 - 1194
  • [26] Prediction of motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores in patients with Parkinson's disease using surface electromyography
    Kleinholdermann, Urs
    Wullstein, Max
    Pedrosa, David
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 132 (07) : 1708 - 1713
  • [27] Detection of Parkinson's Disease Using Rating Scale
    Banita
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (COMPE-2020), 2020, : 121 - 125
  • [28] Correlation between the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale (UPDRS) during L-dopa acute challenge
    Merello, Marcelo
    Roldan Gerschcovich, Eliana
    Ballesteros, Diego
    Cerquetti, Daniel
    PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2011, 17 (09) : 705 - 707
  • [29] HURDLE REGRESSION MODELING: PARKINSON'S DISEASE DATA, SPECIFICALLY CLINICAL PARTICIPANTS OF MOVEMENT DISORDERS SOCIETY UNIFIED PARKINSON'S DISEASE RATING SCALE
    Yusuf, Anisa haura salsa fatih
    Sunusi, Nurtiti
    Herdiani, Erna tri
    COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2024,
  • [30] Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Experiences in Daily Living: Longitudinal Changes and Correlation With Other Assessments
    Lang, Anthony E.
    Eberly, Shirley
    Goetz, Christopher G.
    Stebbins, Glenn
    Oakes, David
    Marek, Ken
    Ravina, Bernard
    Tanner, Caroline M.
    Shoulson, Ira
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2013, 28 (14) : 1980 - 1986