Sensitivity analysis of sustainability indicators using a shifted geometric assessment model

被引:0
作者
Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. [1 ]
Phillis, Yannis A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Crete, Sch Prod Engn & Management, Khania, Greece
[2] Tech Univ Crete, Sch Prod Engn & Management, Khania 73100, Greece
关键词
national sustainability; sustainability indicators; data aggregation; shifted geometric mean; sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2023.2231866
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A multitude of sustainability assessment models exist relying on given sets of basic indicators. In this work we use an analytical model called shifted geometric mean (SGM), which is based on a set of mathematical postulates to perform sensitivity analysis. The purpose of this analysis is to find those indicators with the highest potential for sustainability improvement. This is done via a gradient method under a given budget constraint leading to a novel closed-form expression. The method is applied to 164 countries which are ranked accordingly and then the corresponding most influential indicators are found. Unsurprisingly, European countries, Australia and Uruguay top the list, whereas the bottom is occupied by Sub-Saharan African countries, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen and Haiti. However, the model revealed that Israel, South Korea and Singapore rank surprisingly low due to their poor environmental performance. For similar reasons, Romania and Bulgaria ranked above the USA. Finally, the model exposed the most important aspects in need of improvement, which for developing and low-income countries comprise the economy and social conditions. At the other end of the spectrum, developed countries need to improve their environmental performance. SGM augmented with sensitivity analysis can thus be a practical tool for sustainability decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:938 / 948
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI), 2022, About us
[2]   Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? [J].
Boyd, James .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 61 (04) :716-723
[3]  
Daly HermanE., 1994, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future, V2nd
[4]   A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI - the Sustainable Society Index [J].
de Kerk, Geurt Van ;
Manuel, Arthur R. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (2-3) :228-242
[5]  
Esty D.C., 2005, ENV SUSTAINABILITY I
[6]  
Ewing B., 2010, Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2010 Edition
[7]   A fuzzy based sustainability assessment tool for small island states [J].
Flour, Pierre Olivier St ;
Bokhoree, Chandradeo .
CURRENT RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 4
[8]   SAFE 2019: Updates and new sustainability findings worldwide [J].
Grigoroudis, Evangelos ;
Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. ;
Phillis, Yannis A. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 121
[9]  
Legatum Institute, 2023, The 2023 Legatum Prosperity Index
[10]   Evaluating environmental sustainability: An integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic [J].
Liu, Kevin F. R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 39 (05) :721-736