Robotic colorectal surgery: quality assessment of patient information available on the internet using webscraping

被引:2
|
作者
Taha, Anas [1 ,6 ]
Taha-Mehlitz, Stephanie [2 ]
Bach, Laura [3 ]
Ochs, Vincent [1 ]
Bardakcioglu, Ovunc [4 ]
Honaker, Michael D. [5 ]
Cattin, Philippe C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Fac Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Allschwil, Switzerland
[2] Univ Ctr Gastrointestinal & Liver Dis, Clarunis, Dept Visceral Surgery, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Fac Med, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Nevada, Dept Surg, Las Vegas, NV USA
[5] East Carolina Univ, Dept Surg, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC USA
[6] Univ Basel, Fac Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Hegenheimermattweg 167c, CH-4123 Allschwil, Switzerland
关键词
Robotic colorectal surgery; patient information; webscraping; EQIP; INSTRUMENT; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1080/24699322.2023.2187275
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The primary goal of this study is to assess current patient information available on the internet concerning robotic colorectal surgery. Acquiring this information will aid in patients understanding of robotic colorectal surgery. Data was acquired through a web-scraping algorithm. The algorithm used two Python packages: Beautiful Soup and Selenium. The long-chain keywords incorporated into Google, Bing and Yahoo search engines were 'Da Vinci Colon-Rectal Surgery', 'Colorectal Robotic Surgery' and 'Robotic Bowel Surgery'. 207 websites resulted, were sorted and evaluated according to the ensuring quality information for patients (EQIP) score. Of the 207 websites visited, 49 belonged to the subgroup of hospital websites (23.6%), 46 to medical centers (22.2%), 45 to practitioners (21.7%), 42 to health care systems (20,2%), 11 to news services (5.3%), 7 to web portals (3.3%), 5 to industry (2.4%), and 2 to patient groups (0.9%). Only 52 of the 207 websites received a high rating. The quality of available information on the internet concerning robotic colorectal surgery is low. The majority of information was inaccurate. Medical facilities involved in robotic colorectal surgery, robotic bowel surgery and related robotic procedures should develop websites with credible information to guide patient decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database
    Bhama, Anuradha R.
    Obias, Vincent
    Welch, Kathleen B.
    Vandewarker, James F.
    Cleary, Robert K.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (04): : 1576 - 1584
  • [42] Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
    Williams, A.
    Cunningham, A.
    Hutchings, H.
    Harris, D. A.
    Evans, M. D.
    Harji, D.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2022, 20 (06): : E382 - E391
  • [43] Reliability of Medical Information Provided by ChatGPT: Assessment Against Clinical Guidelines and Patient Information Quality Instrument
    Walker, Harriet Louise
    Ghani, Shahi
    Kuemmerli, Christoph
    Nebiker, Christian Andreas
    Muller, Beat Peter
    Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle
    Staubli, Sebastian Manuel
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [44] Complications after surgery for colorectal cancer affect quality of life and surgeon-patient relationship
    Di Cristofaro, L.
    Ruffolo, C.
    Pinto, E.
    Massa, M.
    Antoniutti, M.
    Cagol, M.
    Massani, M.
    Alfieri, R.
    Costa, A.
    Bassi, N.
    Castoro, C.
    Scarpa, M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (12) : O407 - O419
  • [45] Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer
    Narwani, Vishal
    Nalamada, Keerthana
    Lee, Michael
    Kothari, Prasad
    Lakhani, Raj
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 (04): : 601 - 605
  • [46] The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance
    Hemaya, Monica
    Hemaya, Maria
    Habeeb, Amir
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [47] Assessment of the quality of online patient information resources for patients considering parastomal hernia treatment
    Blackwell, Sue
    Clifford, Scott
    Pinkney, Thomas
    Thompson, Dean
    Mathers, Jonathan
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 26 (05) : 1014 - 1027
  • [48] Quality of Life in Pulmonary Surgery Choosing, Using, and Developing Assessment Tools
    Fitzsimmons, D.
    Wheelwright, S.
    Johnson, C. D.
    THORACIC SURGERY CLINICS, 2012, 22 (04) : 457 - +
  • [49] Does the Internet Provide Quality Information on Metoidioplasty? Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool to Evaluate Artificial Intelligence-Generated and Online Information on Metoidioplasty
    Hirpara, Milan M.
    Amin, Luv
    Aloyan, Toni
    Shilleh, Najla
    Lewis, Priya
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 92 (5S) : S361 - S365
  • [50] Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study
    Chaudhary, Kapil
    Chandna, Abhishek
    Devana, Sudheer Kumar
    Sharma, Aditya Prakash
    Tyagi, Shantanu
    Singh, Shrawan K.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 8