Unraveling the Thought Probes of US Legislators on Trade Negotiations: Sentiment Analysis of the 108th and 112th US Congressional Speeches

被引:0
作者
Choi, Jaedong [1 ]
Park, Rinseo [2 ]
Baek, Young Min [3 ]
Lee, Jae Mook [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Econ Humanities & Social Sci, Yeongi, South Korea
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Yonsei Univ, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hankuk Univ Foreign Studies, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Sentiment analysis of congressional speeches; Australia-US free trade agreement (AUSFTA); Korea-US free trade agreement (KORUS FTA); Security-economy nexus; Electoral connection; DOMESTIC POLITICS; SOUTH-KOREA; AMERICAN;
D O I
10.1111/pafo.12220
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
A plethora of literature has investigated the voting behavior of US legislators on trade bills to reveal a possible causal mechanism. Relying on dichotomous roll-call voting data, however, has certain limitations on revealing the comprehensive thought probes of lawmakers on a complex diplomatic issue such as making an FTA deal. In this paper, we provide new insight to fill such a gap by analyzing congressional speech data during FTA ratification procedures. Using an automated web scraper, we collected the entire speech data (N = 5,372) of Senators and House Representatives in the 108th and 112th US Congress regarding AUSFTA and KORUS FTA, respectively. The speech sentiment analysis results show background and context (i.e., attitude-behavior inconsistency) in the process of trade negotiations and agreements. Additionally, the results help identify important factors (i.e., ideology, constituency stimuli) that influence whether members of Congress stand for and against the FTA implementations.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 104
页数:22
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, KORUS AMENDMENTS MIN
[3]  
Baldwin Robert E., 2000, Congressional Trade Votes: From NAFTA Approval to Fast-Track Defeat
[4]  
Beaulieu Eugene., 2004, ECON POLIT-OXFORD, V16, P163
[5]  
CRS Insight, 2022, BID ADM PLANS IND PA
[6]  
Davison R.H., 2020, C ITS MEMBERS
[7]  
Dee P., 2005, 345 AUSTR JAP RES CT
[8]   Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations [J].
Fearon, JD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 1 :289-313
[9]   Selection and influence: Interest groups and congressional voting on trade policy [J].
Fordham, BO ;
McKeown, TI .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2003, 57 (03) :519-+
[10]   2ND IMAGE REVERSED - INTERNATIONAL SOURCES OF DOMESTIC POLITICS [J].
GOUREVITCH, P .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 1978, 32 (04) :881-911