Soil classification with multi-temporal hyperspectral imagery using spectral unmixing and fusion

被引:0
作者
Kaba, Eylem [1 ,2 ]
Leloglu, Ugur Murat [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Geodet & Geog Informat Technol Dept, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Reg Directorate State Hydraul Works, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Univ Turkish Aeronaut Assoc, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, Astronaut Engn Dept, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
soil classification; hyperspectral; random forest; unmixing; image fusion;
D O I
10.1117/1.JRS.17.044513
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil maps are essential sources for a diverse range of agricultural and environmental studies; hence, the detection of soil properties using remote sensing technology is a hot topic. Satellites carrying hyperspectral sensors provide possibilities for the estimation of soil properties. But, the main obstacle in soil classification with remote sensing methods is the vegetation that has a spectral signature that mixes with that of the soil. The objective of this study is to detect soil texture properties after eliminating the effects of vegetation using hyperspectral imaging data and reducing the noise by fusion. First, the endmembers common to all images and their abundances are determined. Then the endmembers are classified as stable ones (soil, rock, etc.) and unstable ones (green vegetation, dry vegetation, etc.). This method eliminates vegetation from the images with orthogonal subspace projection (OSP) and fuses multiple images with the weighted mean for a better signal-to-noise-ratio. Finally, the fused image is classified to obtain the soil maps. The method is tested on synthetic images and hyperion hyperspectral images of an area in Texas, United States. With three synthetic images, the individual classification results are 89.14%, 89.81%, and 93.79%. After OSP, the rates increase to 92.23%, 93.13%, and 95.38%, respectively, whereas it increases to 96.97% with fusion. With real images from the dates 22/06/2013, 25/09/2013, and 24/10/2013, the classification accuracies increase from 70.51%, 68.87%, and 63.18% to 71.96%, 71.78%, and 64.17%, respectively. Fusion provides a better improvement in classification with a 75.27% accuracy. The results for the analysis of the real images from 2016 yield similar improvements. The classification accuracies increase from 57.07%, 62.81%, and 63.80% to 58.99%, 63.93%, and 66.33%, respectively. Fusion also provides a better classification accuracy of 69.02% for this experiment. The results show that the method can improve the classification accuracy with the elimination of vegetation and with the fusion of multiple images. The approach is promising and can be applied to various other classification tasks.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Basile R. M., 1971, A Geography of Soils
  • [2] Quick atmospheric correction code: algorithm description and recent upgrades
    Bernstein, Lawrence S.
    Jin, Xuemin
    Gregor, Brian
    Adler-Golden, Steven M.
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 51 (11)
  • [3] Errors in soil maps: The need for better on-site estimates and soil map predictions
    Buenemann, Michaela
    Coetzee, Marina E.
    Kutuahupira, Josephat
    Maynard, Jonathan J.
    Herrick, Jeffrey E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [4] Evaluation of Two Portable Hyperspectral-Sensor-Based Instruments to Predict Key Soil Properties in Canadian Soils
    Dhawale, Nandkishor M.
    Adamchuk, Viacheslav I.
    Prasher, Shiv O.
    Rossel, Raphael A. Viscarra
    Ismail, Ashraf A.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (07)
  • [5] Machine learning and remote sensing techniques applied to estimate soil indicators-Review
    Diaz-Gonzalez, Freddy A.
    Vuelvas, Jose
    Correa, Carlos A.
    Vallejo, Victoria E.
    Patino, D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 135
  • [6] High Resolution Mapping of Soil Properties Using Remote Sensing Variables in South-Western Burkina Faso: A Comparison of Machine Learning and Multiple Linear Regression Models
    Forkuor, Gerald
    Hounkpatin, Ozias K. L.
    Welp, Gerhard
    Thiel, Michael
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [7] The sequential maximum angle convex cone (SMACC) endmember model
    Gruninger, J
    Ratkowski, AJ
    Hoke, ML
    [J]. ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY X, 2004, 5425 : 1 - 14
  • [8] HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION AND DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION - AN ORTHOGONAL SUBSPACE PROJECTION APPROACH
    HARSANYI, JC
    CHANG, CI
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1994, 32 (04): : 779 - 785
  • [9] Soil maps of the world
    Hartemink, Alfred E.
    Krasilnikov, Pavel
    Bockheim, J. G.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2013, 207 : 256 - 267
  • [10] A Review of Nonlinear Hyperspectral Unmixing Methods
    Heylen, Rob
    Parente, Mario
    Gader, Paul
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 7 (06) : 1844 - 1868