Exploring the pathways of learning from project failure and success in new product development teams

被引:24
作者
Balzano, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Marzi, Giacomo [3 ]
机构
[1] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Management, 873 Cannaregio, I-30121 Venice, Italy
[2] SKEMA Business Sch, KTO Res Ctr, 60 Rue Fedor Dostoievski, F-06902 Sophia Antipolis, France
[3] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, Piazza San Francesco 19, I-55100 Lucca, Italy
关键词
Team learning; Project failure; Project success; Learning pathways; New product development; Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE; COMPLEXITY; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; COHESION; MODEL; CUSTOMER; LEVEL; ANTECEDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102878
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In today's business environment, New Product Development (NPD) teams play a pivotal role in propelling innovation. Within NPD teams, both successful and failed projects contribute in enhancing learning processes, yet the epistemological pathways activated by successful projects differ distinctly from those stimulated by failed projects. In this study, we investigate the pathways towards team learning in the context of successful and failed NPD projects using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). Drawing from the team learning literature, we examine which configurations of project characteristics (complexity and uncertainty), interpersonal team characteristics (innovation norms, cohesion, and decision-making autonomy), and environmental characteristics (technological and market turbulence) lead to NPD team learning. Our analysis identifies three configurations of factors tied to NPD team learning in successful projects and four configurations in failed projects. In successful projects, project and team characteristics are core in enhancing team learning. In failed projects, together with team characteristics, core conditions are represented by project complexity, uncertainty, while environmental characteristics play a dual role.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   The relationship between imperfect information and performance speed: The mediation of improvisation in new product development teams [J].
Acikgoz, Atif ;
Acikgoz, Fulya ;
Gunsel, Ayse ;
Latham, Gary P. .
TECHNOVATION, 2023, 121
[2]   Learning from the failure: experiences in the Korean telecommunications market [J].
Ahn, JH ;
Kim, MS ;
Lee, DJ .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (01) :69-82
[3]   Team stressors, management support, and project and process outcomes in new product development projects [J].
Akgun, Ali E. ;
Byrne, John C. ;
Lynn, Gary S. ;
Keskin, Halit .
TECHNOVATION, 2007, 27 (10) :628-639
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, International Journal of. Project. Management
[5]   Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions [J].
Argote, Linda ;
Lee, Sunkee ;
Park, Jisoo .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (09) :5399-5429
[6]  
Bajarin T., 2022, Pen computing and apple's Newton message pad's impact on today's mobile computing
[7]   Serendipity in management studies: a literature review and future research directions [J].
Balzano, Marco .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2022, 60 (13) :130-152
[8]   Aspiration performance and railroads′ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes [J].
Baum, Joel A. C. ;
Dahlin, Kristina B. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (03) :368-385
[9]   Do Opportunities for Formal Learning Stimulate Follow-Up Participation in Informal Learning? A Three-Wave Study [J].
Bednall, Timothy C. ;
Sanders, Karin .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 56 (05) :803-820
[10]  
Bellis P., 2022, Eur. Manag. J.