Reference intervals and sources of variation of pressure pain threshold for quantitative sensory testing in a Japanese population

被引:0
作者
Suzuki, Hidenori [1 ,2 ]
Tahara, Shu [2 ,3 ]
Mitsuda, Mao [2 ,3 ]
Funaba, Masahiro [1 ]
Fujimoto, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Ikeda, Hiroaki [1 ]
Izumi, Hironori [2 ,3 ]
Yukata, Kiminori [1 ,3 ]
Seki, Kazushige [1 ,3 ]
Uranami, Kota [1 ]
Ichihara, Kiyoshi [4 ]
Nishida, Norihiro [1 ,3 ]
Sakai, Takashi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yamaguchi Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1-1-1 Minamikogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 7558505, Japan
[2] Yamaguchi Univ, Pain Management Res Inst, Yamaguchi, Japan
[3] Yamaguchi Univ, Dept Rehabil, Yamaguchi, Japan
[4] Yamaguchi Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Grad Sch Med, Yamaguchi, Japan
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; DEEP-TISSUE HYPERALGESIA; CENTRAL SENSITIZATION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; EXERCISE; SENSITIVITY; MODULATION; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-40201-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is useful when analysing musculoskeletal pain disorders. A handheld algometer is most commonly used for pressure pain threshold (PPT) tests. However, reference intervals for PPTs are not elucidated. We assessed reference intervals of PPTs for QST in 158 healthy adult Japanese with no history of musculoskeletal or neurological problems. A handheld algometer was used to record PPT at five different assessment sites on the body: lumbar paravertebral muscle, musculus gluteus maximus, quadriceps, tibialis anterior muscle, and anterior talofibular ligament. Multiple regression analysis was performed to explore sources of variation of PPT according to sex, age, body mass index, UCLA Activity Level Rating, and Tegner Activity Score. Reference intervals were determined parametrically by Gaussian transformation of PPT values using the two-parameter Box-Cox formula. Results of multiple regression analysis revealed that age was significantly associated with PPT of lumbar paravertebral muscle and musculus gluteus maximus. In females, body mass index showed significant positive correlation with PPT of anterior talofibular ligament, and UCLA Activity Level Rating also showed significant positive association with tibialis anterior muscle and anterior talofibular ligament. Site-specific reference intervals of PPTs for Japanese are of practical relevance in fields of pain research using a handheld algometer.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sex Differences in Pain and Quantitative Sensory Testing in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Vogel, Kelly
    Muhammad, Lutfiyya N.
    Song, Jing
    Neogi, Tuhina
    Bingham, Clifton O.
    Bolster, Marcy B.
    Marder, Wendy
    Wohlfahrt, Alyssa
    Clauw, Daniel J.
    Dunlop, Dorothy
    Lee, Yvonne C. C.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2023, 75 (12) : 2472 - 2480
  • [22] Chronic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Utility of Sensory Quantitative Testing in Patients with Fibromyalgia Comorbidity
    Pompa, Alessandra
    Clemenzi, Allessandro
    Troisi, Elio
    Pace, Luca
    Casillo, Paolo
    Catani, Sheila
    Grasso, Maria Grazia
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2015, 73 (5-6) : 257 - 263
  • [23] The Modulatory Effect of Quantitative Sensory Testing in Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lyng, Kristian Damgaard
    Thorsen, Jens Bredbjerg Brock
    Larsen, Dennis Boye
    Petersen, Kristian Kjaer
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (04) : 733 - 744
  • [24] Quantitative Sensory Testing in pain assesment and treatment. Brief review and algorithmic management proposal
    Avellanal, M.
    Riquelme, I.
    Diaz-Reganon, G.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2020, 67 (04): : 187 - 194
  • [25] Can Quantitative Sensory Testing Move Us Closer to Mechanism-Based Pain Management?
    Cruz-Almeida, Yenisel
    Fillingim, Roger B.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (01) : 61 - 72
  • [26] Quantitative Sensory Testing of Spinal Cord and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Chronic Pain Patients
    Sankarasubramanian, Vishwanath
    Chiravuri, Srinivas
    Mirzakhalili, Ehsan
    Anaya, Carlos J.
    Scott, John Ryan
    Brummett, Chad M.
    Clauw, Daniel J.
    Patil, Parag G.
    Harte, Steven E.
    Lempka, Scott F.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (04): : 672 - 684
  • [27] Quantitative sensory testing: A stimulating look at chronic pain
    Brown, Dorothy Cimino
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2012, 193 (02) : 315 - 316
  • [28] Development and validation of a pressure-type automated quantitative sensory testing system for point-of-care pain assessment
    Harte, Steven E.
    Mitra, Mainak
    Ichesco, Eric A.
    Halvorson, Megan E.
    Clauw, Daniel J.
    Shih, Albert J.
    Kruger, Grant H.
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2013, 51 (06) : 633 - 644
  • [29] Relationship between quantitative sensory testing and pain or disability in people with spinal pain-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huebscher, Markus
    Moloney, Niamh
    Leaver, Andrew
    Rebbeck, Trudy
    McAuley, James H.
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    PAIN, 2013, 154 (09) : 1497 - 1504
  • [30] Concurrent validity of dynamic bedside quantitative sensory testing paradigms in breast cancer survivors with persistent pain
    Haenen, Vincent
    Meeus, Mira
    Devoogdt, Nele
    Morlion, Bart
    Dams, Lore
    De Groote, Amber
    Foubert, Anthe
    De Groef, An
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 24 (01)