Participatory landscape sustainability assessment: where do we stand? A systematic literature review

被引:3
作者
Moreau, Clemence [1 ]
Blanco, Julien [1 ]
Randriamalala, Josoa [2 ]
Laques, Anne-Elisabeth [3 ]
Carriere, Stephanie M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, IRD, CIRAD, UMR SENS,1SENS, St Charles, Route Mende, F-34199 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Antananarivo, Ecole Super Sci Agron, Ment Eaux & Forets, BP 175, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
[3] Univ Nouvelle Caledonie, Univ Guyane, Univ La Reunion, Univ Antilles,Espace Dev IRD,Univ Montpellier, Antananarivo, Madagascar
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Assessment; Indicators; Landscape sustainability; Participation; Sustainability science; CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; INDICATORS; PREFERENCE; SCENARIOS; DESIGN; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-023-01695-x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
ContextIn line with inter- and transdisciplinary approaches promoted in Sustainability Science, Participatory Landscape Sustainability Assessments (PLSA) are developing at a rapid pace. PLSA approaches share with other assessments the aim of standardizing observations, while sharing with participatory processes place-based and context-specific viewpoints from diverse stakeholders.ObjectiveThis literature review presents different PLSA approaches identified in studies, and argues that the lack of a coherent framework and poor substantive theorization can limit the development of PLSA research.MethodsThe study involved a systematic literature review on a corpus of 425 publications, combining bibliographic mapping on the full corpus and a content analysis of a sub-corpus of 138 full texts.ResultsThe review of the literature showed that (i) PLSA studies lie at the intersection of ecology, landscape planning and sociocultural approaches, (ii) PLSA indicators evaluate on average 4.7 categories of sustainability, but most are applied at a local level and provide a snapshot of a situation, (iii) stakeholders tend not to be involved in the choice of indicators (only 28.9% of studies) and even more rarely in assessment design (7.2%). When stakeholders are included, they are usually only asked to populate preidentified indicators (63.9%). (iv) Diverse viewpoints are taken into consideration mainly by using indicators (67.3%) rather than by promoting discussion (39.8%). Three types of PLSA study can be differentiated: the participation-oriented approach, the contributive approach (rooted in positivism) and the collaborative approach (rooted in constructivism).ConclusionWe advocate that future PLSA studies pay more attention to consistency between their objectives, the methods they employ, and the theoretical grounding they enlist. This might help to avoid confusion about different participatory approaches and to understand their respective contributions to Landscape Sustainability Science.
引用
收藏
页码:1903 / 1918
页数:16
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Indigenous Agricultural Systems in the Dry Zone of Sri Lanka: Management Transformation Assessment and Sustainability [J].
Abeywardana, Nuwan ;
Schuett, Brigitta ;
Wagalawatta, Thusitha ;
Bebermeier, Wiebke .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (03)
[2]   The Heritagization of a Mediterranean Vernacular Mountain Landscape: Concepts, Problems and Processes [J].
Altaba Tena, Pablo ;
Garcia-Esparza, Juan A. .
HERITAGE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 11 (03) :189-210
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, European Treaty Series, P8
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, LANG ENV STAT COMP
[5]   Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis [J].
Antrop, M .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 77 (1-2) :17-28
[6]   Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services (CESs) and key urban landscape features: a pilot study for land use policy and planning review [J].
Bachi, Laura ;
Faria, Diomira M. C. P. ;
Horta, Marise Barreiros ;
Carvalho-Ribeiro, Sonia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 13 (02) :420-434
[7]   People, nature and large herbivores in a shared landscape: A mixed-method study of the ecological and social outcomes from agriculture and conservation [J].
Balfour, Nicholas J. ;
Durrant, Rachael ;
Ely, Adrian ;
Sandom, Christopher J. .
PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2021, 3 (02) :418-430
[8]   Resources use, conservation attitudes, management intervention and park-people relations in the Western Terai landscape of Nepal [J].
Baral, Nabin ;
Heinen, Joel T. .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 34 (01) :64-72
[9]   Equity, Power Games, and Legitimacy: Dilemmas of Participatory Natural Resource Management [J].
Barnaud, Cecile ;
Van Paassen, Annemarie .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (02)
[10]   The production of intercultural urban landscapes, a multi-scalar approach: the case of Ballaro, Palermo [J].
Barreiro, Federico Wulff ;
Gonzalez, Oscar Brito .
URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 25 (03) :250-265