A mixed-methods evaluation of the Vamos por Mas! parenting program implementation in Chile

被引:0
作者
Meyer, Jessica K. V. [1 ,2 ]
Diaspro, Gabriela [1 ]
Munoz, Ivan [3 ]
Burmeister, Catalina [3 ]
Garcia-Huidobro, Diego [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Family Med, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Rochester Family Med Residency, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Hogar Cristo, Fdn Parentesis, Santiago, Chile
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Vicuna Mackenna 4686, Santiago, Chile
来源
JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION | 2023年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
adolescents; Chile; implementation; parenting program; substance use; COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1097/XEB.0000000000000350
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and aims: Substance use is a significant global concern. Strengthening parenting in families with adolescents has been shown to reduce substance use initiation. The Vamos por Mas! (VxM!) program is a positive-parenting program developed in Chile to improve family relations and reduce adolescent substance use that combines in-person school workshops, multimedia messaging and personalized support. This manuscript reports a mixed-methods evaluation of the pilot implementation of the VxM! program utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Proctor's taxonomy for process outcomes. Methods: An explanatory sequential design was used. Quantitative methods evaluated program use, acceptability, appropriateness, and fidelity, and were followed by qualitative focus groups (FGs) to assess the implementation process and understand these outcomes. Thirteen FGs stratified by school and role, including school leaders, program facilitators, participants, and researchers, were conducted. Results: The program was implemented in three schools, reaching 253 families with in-person workshops (40.5% of potential participants), 257 parents who viewed on average 72.1% of sent multimedia messages, and 2 families who used the personalized support (0.3%). Overall, the program was viewed as acceptable and appropriate by participants and implementers due to the high quality of program materials, targeted content, and activities. Implementation differed by schools. Key implementation factors were the outer context, inner school setting, and implementation processes. Conclusions: This comprehensive evaluation, including both intervention implementers and participants, identified implementation facilitators, barriers, and outcomes. Future VxM! implementations should alter program components of schools with lower engagement to improve program implementation and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 112
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Abroms LC, 2015, JMIR MHEALTH UHEALTH, V3, DOI [10.2196/mhealth.4917, 10.2196/mhealth.3846]
  • [2] Effective Parenting Interventions to Reduce Youth Substance Use: A Systematic Review
    Allen, Michele L.
    Garcia-Huidobro, Diego
    Porta, Carolyn
    Curran, Dorothy
    Patel, Roma
    Miller, Jonathan
    Borowsky, Iris
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2016, 138 (02)
  • [3] Alvarez M., 2016, RES SOCIAL WORK PRAC, V28, P173
  • [4] Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-based parent-training: A systematic review and critique of guiding evidence
    Baumann, Ana A.
    Powell, Byron J.
    Kohl, Patricia L.
    Tabak, Rachel G.
    Penalba, Valentina
    Proctor, Enola K.
    Domenech-Rodriguez, Melanie M.
    Cabassa, Leopoldo J.
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2015, 53 : 113 - 120
  • [5] Evaluating Implementation Fidelity of a School-Based Parenting Program for Low-Income Families
    Bettencourt, Amie F.
    Gross, Deborah
    Breitenstein, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL NURSING, 2019, 35 (05) : 325 - 336
  • [6] Measuring Implementation Fidelity in a Community-Based Parenting Intervention
    Breitenstein, Susan M.
    Fogg, Louis
    Garvey, Christine
    Hill, Carri
    Resnick, Barbara
    Gross, Deborah
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2010, 59 (03) : 158 - 165
  • [7] Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
    Campbell, M
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Haines, A
    Kinmonth, AL
    Sandercock, P
    Spiegelhalter, D
    Tyrer, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262): : 694 - 696
  • [8] Involving the headteacher in the development of school-based health interventions: A mixed-methods outcome and process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework
    Christian, Danielle L.
    Todd, Charlotte
    Rance, Jaynie
    Stratton, Gareth
    Mackintosh, Kelly A.
    Rapport, Frances
    Brophy, Sinead
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04):
  • [9] Correa M, 2018, SOC PREVENTION RES 2
  • [10] Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
    Craig, Peter
    Dieppe, Paul
    Macintyre, Sally
    Michie, Susan
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Petticrew, Mark
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676): : 979 - 983