Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study

被引:35
|
作者
Chen, Jianping [1 ]
Bai, Xiaolei [2 ]
Ding, Yude [1 ]
Shen, Liheng [1 ]
Sun, Xin [3 ]
Cao, Ruijue [2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ]
Wang, Linhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Dental implant robotic system; Dynamic navigation system; Dental implant; Accuracy; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-02873-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a novel dental implant robotic system (THETA) and a dynamic navigation system ( Yizhimei) by a vitro model experiment. Methods 10 partially edentulous jaws models were included in this study, and 20 sites were randomly assigned into two groups: the dental implant robotic system (THETA) group and a dynamic navigation system (Yizhimei) group. 20 implants were placed in the defects according to each manufacturer's protocol respectively. The implant platform, apex and angle deviations were measured by fusion of the preoperative design and the actual postoperative conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) using 3D Slicer software. Data were analyzed by t - test and Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 20 implants were placed in 10 phantoms. The comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation in THETA group were 0.58 +/- 0.31 mm, 0.69 +/- 0.28 mm, and 1.08 +/- 0.66 degrees respectively, while in Yizhimei group, the comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation were 0.73 +/- 0.20 mm, 0.86 +/- 0.33 mm, and 2.32 +/- 0.71 degrees respectively. The angulation deviation in THETA group was significantly smaller than the Yizhimei group, and there was no significant difference in the deviation of the platform and apex of the implants placed using THETA and Yizhimei, respectively. Conclusion The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system, especially the angular deviation was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that the THETA robotic system could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery in the future. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the current results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study
    Jianping Chen
    Xiaolei Bai
    Yude Ding
    Liheng Shen
    Xin Sun
    Ruijue Cao
    Fan Yang
    Linhong Wang
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [2] Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study
    Tao, Baoxin
    Feng, Yuan
    Fan, Xingqi
    Zhuang, Minjie
    Chen, Xiaojun
    Wang, Feng
    Wu, Yiqun
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 123
  • [3] Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery
    Panchal, Neeraj
    Mahmood, Laith
    Retana, Armando
    Emery, Robert, III
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 31 (04) : 539 - +
  • [4] Comparison of the Accuracy of Pilot Drill-Guided and Fully Guided Implant Surgery With Dynamic Navigation: In Vitro Model Study
    Bilge, Suheyb
    Demetoglu, Umut
    Aslan, Senol
    Simsek, Hasan Onur
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2025, 51 (01) : 105 - 110
  • [5] Analysis of the accuracy of a dynamic navigation system when performing dental implant surgery with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A pilot study
    Wu, Bin-Zhang
    Ma, Fei-Fei
    Sun, Feng
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2023, 18 (04) : 1747 - 1755
  • [6] The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Wang, Xiao-yu
    Liu, Lin
    Guan, Miao-sheng
    Liu, Qian
    Zhao, Tong
    Li, Hong-bo
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 124
  • [7] The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Wang, Xiao-Yu
    Liu, Lin
    Guan, Miao-Sheng
    Liu, Qian
    Zhao, Tong
    Li, Hong-Bo
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 124
  • [8] Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system in dental implant surgery
    Wu, Yu
    Zou, Shiqi
    Lv, Pin
    Wang, Xiao
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (03): : 764 - 770
  • [9] Accuracy of a Novel Robot-Assisted System and Dynamic Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement: A Clinical Retrospective Study
    Chen, Jianping
    Ding, Yude
    Cao, Ruijue
    Zheng, Yuchen
    Shen, Liheng
    Wang, Linhong
    Yang, Fan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [10] Accuracy of different registration areas using active and passive dynamic navigation systems in dental implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Wu, Bin-Zhang
    Ma, Fei-Fei
    Yan, Xiao-Yan
    Sun, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (08) : 888 - 897