Biodiversity and the Recreational Value of Green Infrastructure in England

被引:1
|
作者
Murkin, Katherine [1 ]
Shiode, Narushige [2 ]
Shiode, Shino [3 ]
Kidd, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Somerset Wildlife Trust, Nat Recovery Team, Taunton TA1 5AW, Somerset, England
[2] Kingston Univ, Dept Geog Geol & Environm, Kingston Upon Thames KT1 2EE, Surrey, England
[3] Birkbeck Univ London, Dept Geog, London WC1E 7HX, England
关键词
biodiversity; geographically weighted regression; green infrastructure; spatial analysis; wildlife species; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SPECIES RICHNESS; IMPACT; QUALITY; SPACE;
D O I
10.3390/su15042915
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green infrastructure refers to connected corridors of greenspaces within and beyond urban areas. It provides sustainable ecosystem goods and services for people and wildlife, enhancing their wellbeing and protecting them against climatic extremes. However, the exact contributing factors to the betterment of green infrastructure are not systematically examined at a national level. This study aims to identify what helps improve biodiversity and the recreational value of green infrastructure. The study uses hotspot analysis, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and geographically weighted regression (GWR) to understand the spatial patterns of the relevant variables and outcomes. Findings suggest that high wildlife species richness was reported in Forestry Commission woodlands and country parks, whilst doorstep greens and village greens returned poor species richness. The recreational value of greenspace was affected the most by certain types of greenspace (e.g., woodlands) as well as the percentage of urban cover. They indicate that biodiversity is generally high in areas away from urban centres, while access to greenspace in an urban space brings us high recreational value. These results indicate that green infrastructure is a complex system that requires the right balance between different priorities and services.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High Biodiversity of Green Infrastructure Does Not Contribute to Recreational Ecosystem Services
    Sikorska, Daria
    Sikorski, Piotr
    Hopkins, Richard James
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03)
  • [2] GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND URBAN BIODIVERSITY
    Savvas, Warwick
    LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FRONTIERS, 2016, 4 (03) : 40 - 51
  • [3] GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE ECONOMY OF RECREATIONAL NATURE USE
    Andryeyeva, Natalya
    Nezdoyminov, Sergey
    Martyniuk, Olena
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2018, 4 (04) : 6 - 13
  • [4] Can green infrastructure help to conserve biodiversity?
    Salomaa, Anna
    Paloniemi, Riikka
    Kotiaho, Janne S.
    Kettunen, Marianne
    Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
    Cent, Joanna
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2017, 35 (02) : 265 - 288
  • [5] Investing in biodiversity: The recreational value of a natural coastal area
    Dall'Aste Brandolini, Silva Marzetti
    CHEMISTRY AND ECOLOGY, 2006, 22 : 443 - 462
  • [6] Is biodiversity attractive?-On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space
    Qiu, Ling
    Lindberg, Stefan
    Nielsen, Anders Busse
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2013, 119 : 136 - 146
  • [7] The value of green walls to urban biodiversity
    Collins, Rebecca
    Schaafsma, Marije
    Hudson, Malcolm D.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 64 : 114 - 123
  • [8] Stewardship and green infrastructure in England planning perspectives informed through an investigation of urban green infrastructure
    Davies, Clive
    Muro, Rocio Santo-Tomas
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 67 (12) : 2748 - 2773
  • [9] Understanding green infrastructure: the development of a contested concept in England
    Wright, Hannah
    LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 16 (10) : 1003 - 1019
  • [10] Biodiversity and Green Infrastructure in Europe: Boundary object or ecological trap?
    Garmendia, Eneko
    Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
    Adams, William M.
    Bormpoudakis, Dimitrios
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 56 : 315 - 319