Crowdsourced text analysis to characterize the US National Parks based on cultural ecosystem services

被引:20
作者
Kong, Inhye [1 ,2 ]
Sarmiento, Fausto O. [2 ]
Mu, Lan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Geog, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Geog, Athens, GA USA
关键词
Social media; Online tourism review; Text analysis; Protected areas; Landscape management; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; LANDSCAPE VALUES; PLACE; EXPLORATION; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104692
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Perceiving cultural ecosystem services (CES) are subject to physical landscape settings and sociocultural context. However, we still have a limited understanding of multiple CES and how they differ across heterogeneous landscapes. This study aims to identify and compare eight different CES across 48 National Parks in the United States. The study uses TripAdvisor reviews as a source of data and applies text analysis and a crowdsourced lexicon to assign CES for phrasal expressions.We found that the parks can be grouped into four categories based on the composition of CES: (a) Aesthetic, (b) Biological/Spiritual, (c) Recreation/Identity, or (d) Cultural/Educational/Social values. The most commonly used phrases in the reviews correspond to the specific CES group of the park, while describing key attractions and popular activities. The geographic distribution of the parks also revealed spatial autocorrelations depending on the CES group. Overall, the study demonstrates how crowdsourced text analysis can be used to inform data-driven management strategies that promote unique niches for tourism while diversifying conservation agendas.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Benoit Kenneth, 2023, CRAN
  • [3] Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews
    Bieling, Claudia
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Pirker, Heidemarie
    Vogl, Christian R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 105 : 19 - 30
  • [4] Bryan Jennifer, 2024, CRAN
  • [5] An exploration of the relationships between cultural ecosystem services, socio-cultural values and well-being
    Bullock, Craig
    Joyce, Deirdre
    Collier, Marcus
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 31 : 142 - 152
  • [6] Conservation planning for ecosystem services
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Shaw, M. Rebecca
    Cameron, David R.
    Underwood, Emma C.
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (11) : 2138 - 2152
  • [7] Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Satterfield, Terre
    Goldstein, Joshua
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 74 : 8 - 18
  • [8] Using geo-tagged Instagram posts to reveal landscape values around current and proposed hydroelectric dams and their reservoirs
    Chen, Yan
    Parkins, John R.
    Sherren, Kate
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 170 : 283 - 292
  • [9] Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods
    Cheng, Xin
    Van Damme, Sylvie
    Li, Luyuan
    Uyttenhove, Pieter
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 37
  • [10] Manager strategies and user demands: Determinants of cultural ecosystem service bundles on private protected areas
    Clements, Hayley S.
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 228 - 237