Differences in neural encoding of speech in noise between cochlear implant users with and without preserved acoustic hearing

被引:3
|
作者
Shim, Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Subong [2 ]
Hong, Jean [3 ]
Na, Youngmin [4 ]
Woo, Jihwan [5 ]
Hansen, Marlan [6 ]
Gantz, Bruce [6 ]
Choi, Inyong [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Rochester Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Comp Engn Technol, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
[2] Montclair State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Montclair, NJ 07043 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[5] Univ Ulsan, Dept Biomed Engn, Ulsan, South Korea
[6] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[7] 250 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Cochlear implants; Speech-in-noise; Speech unmasking; Electroencephalography (EEG); Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS); SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULATION; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2022.108649
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Cochlear implants (CIs) have evolved to combine residual acoustic hearing with electric hearing. It has been expected that CI users with residual acoustic hearing experience better speech-in-noise perception than CI-only listeners because preserved acoustic cues aid unmasking speech from background noise. This study sought neural substrate of better speech unmasking in CI users with preserved acoustic hearing compared to those with lower degree of acoustic hearing. Cortical evoked responses to speech in multi -talker babble noise were compared between 29 Hybrid (i.e., electric acoustic stimulation or EAS) and 29 electric-only CI users. The amplitude ratio of evoked responses to speech and noise, or internal SNR, was significantly larger in the CI users with EAS. This result indicates that CI users with better residual acoustic hearing exhibit enhanced unmasking of speech from background noise.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neurophysiological Differences in Emotional Processing by Cochlear Implant Users, Extending Beyond the Realm of Speech
    Deroche, Mickael L. D.
    Felezeu, Mihaela
    Paquette, Sebastien
    Zeitouni, Anthony
    Lehmann, Alexandre
    EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (05) : 1197 - 1209
  • [22] Digit Training in Noise Can Improve Cochlear Implant Users' Speech Understanding in Noise
    Oba, Sandra I.
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    Galvin, John J., III
    EAR AND HEARING, 2011, 32 (05) : 573 - 581
  • [23] Neural encoding of spectro-temporal cues at slow and near speech-rate in cochlear implant users
    Undurraga, Jaime A.
    Van Yper, Lindsey
    Bance, Manohar
    McAlpine, David
    Vickers, Deborah
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2021, 403
  • [24] Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing
    Yang, Hsin-I
    Zeng, Fan-Gang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 : S17 - S22
  • [25] Error Patterns Analysis of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users as a Function of Noise
    Chun, Hyungi
    Ma, Sunmi
    Han, Woojae
    Chun, Youngmyoung
    JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2015, 19 (03) : 144 - 153
  • [26] Sound Localization in Noise by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users
    Kerber, Stefan
    Seeber, Bernhard U.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2012, 33 (04) : 445 - 457
  • [27] Effects of Cooperating and Conflicting Cues on Speech Intonation Recognition by Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners
    Peng, Shu-Chen
    Lu, Nelson
    Chatterjee, Monita
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2009, 14 (05) : 327 - 337
  • [28] Beamforming and Single-Microphone Noise Reduction: Effects on Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
    Stronks, H. Christiaan
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2022, 26
  • [29] The Impact of Bimodal Hearing on Speech Acoustics of Vowel Production in Adult Cochlear Implant Users
    Luo, Xin
    Daliri, Ayoub
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2023, 66 (05): : 1511 - 1524
  • [30] Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation. Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions
    Rader, T.
    HNO, 2015, 63 (02) : 85 - 93