Differences in neural encoding of speech in noise between cochlear implant users with and without preserved acoustic hearing

被引:3
|
作者
Shim, Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Subong [2 ]
Hong, Jean [3 ]
Na, Youngmin [4 ]
Woo, Jihwan [5 ]
Hansen, Marlan [6 ]
Gantz, Bruce [6 ]
Choi, Inyong [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Rochester Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Comp Engn Technol, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
[2] Montclair State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Montclair, NJ 07043 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[5] Univ Ulsan, Dept Biomed Engn, Ulsan, South Korea
[6] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[7] 250 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Cochlear implants; Speech-in-noise; Speech unmasking; Electroencephalography (EEG); Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS); SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULATION; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2022.108649
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Cochlear implants (CIs) have evolved to combine residual acoustic hearing with electric hearing. It has been expected that CI users with residual acoustic hearing experience better speech-in-noise perception than CI-only listeners because preserved acoustic cues aid unmasking speech from background noise. This study sought neural substrate of better speech unmasking in CI users with preserved acoustic hearing compared to those with lower degree of acoustic hearing. Cortical evoked responses to speech in multi -talker babble noise were compared between 29 Hybrid (i.e., electric acoustic stimulation or EAS) and 29 electric-only CI users. The amplitude ratio of evoked responses to speech and noise, or internal SNR, was significantly larger in the CI users with EAS. This result indicates that CI users with better residual acoustic hearing exhibit enhanced unmasking of speech from background noise.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing
    Visram, Anisa S.
    Azadpour, Mahan
    Kluk, Karolina
    McKay, Colette M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 131 (05) : 4042 - 4050
  • [2] Speech Prosody Perception in Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Residual Hearing
    Marx, Mathieu
    James, Christopher
    Foxton, Jessica
    Capber, Amandine
    Fraysse, Bernard
    Barone, Pascal
    Deguine, Olivier
    EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (02) : 239 - 248
  • [3] Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users
    Berger, Joel I.
    Gander, Phillip E.
    Kim, Subong
    Schwalje, Adam T.
    Woo, Jihwan
    Na, Young-min
    Holmes, Ann
    Hong, Jean M.
    Dunn, Camille C.
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    McMurray, Bob
    Griffiths, Timothy D.
    Choi, Inyong
    EAR AND HEARING, 2023, 44 (05) : 1107 - 1120
  • [4] Neural Modulation Transmission Is a Marker for Speech Perception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users
    Gransier, Robin
    Luke, Robert
    van Wieringen, Astrid
    Wouters, Jan
    EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 (03) : 591 - 602
  • [5] The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners
    Bhargava, Pranesh
    Gaudrain, Etienne
    Baskent, Deniz
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 17 (05): : 475 - 491
  • [6] The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Zeman, Annette
    Neukam, Jonathan
    Wang, Binhuan
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (03) : 621 - 635
  • [7] Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users
    Goehring, Tobias
    Bolner, Federico
    Monaghan, Jessica J. M.
    van Dijk, Bas
    Zarowski, Andrzej
    Bleeck, Stefan
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 344 : 183 - 194
  • [8] Preserved Acoustic Hearing in Cochlear Implantation Improves Speech Perception
    Sheffield, Sterling W.
    Jahn, Kelly
    Gifford, Rene H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (02) : 145 - 154
  • [9] Neural tracking of the speech envelope in cochlear implant users
    Somers, Ben
    Verschueren, Eline
    Francart, Tom
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (01)
  • [10] Multidimensional scaling between acoustic and electric stimuli in cochlear implant users with contralateral hearing
    Vermeire, Katrien
    Landsberger, David M.
    Schleich, Peter
    Van de Heyning, Paul H.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 306 : 29 - 36