University admission process: a prescriptive analytics approach

被引:13
作者
Kiaghadi, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Hoseinpour, Pooya [1 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management Syst, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Prediction; Random forest; Principle component analysis; Mathematical programming; Multi-objective optimization; Decision support tool; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; STUDENT; REGRESSION; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; ENROLLMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10462-022-10171-y
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Students typically do not have practical tools to help them choose their target universities to apply. This work proposes a comprehensive analytics framework as a decision support tool that assists students in their admission process. As an essential element of the developed framework, a prediction procedure is developed to precisely determine the student's chance of admission to each university using various machine learning methods. It is concluded that random forest combined with kernel principal component analysis outperforms other prediction models. Besides, an online survey is built to elicit the utility of the student regarding each university. A mathematical programming model is then proposed to determine the best universities to apply among the candidates considering the probable limitations; the most important is the student's budget. The model is also extended to consider multiple objectives for making decisions. Last, a case study is provided to show the practicality of the developed decision support tool.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 256
页数:24
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [41] CROSS-VALIDATION OF REGRESSION-MODELS
    PICARD, RR
    COOK, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 79 (387) : 575 - 583
  • [42] Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest
    Probst, Philipp
    Wright, Marvin N.
    Boulesteix, Anne-Laure
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2019, 9 (03)
  • [43] Ragab AHM, 2012, INT CONF INTELL SYST, P107, DOI 10.1109/ISDA.2012.6416521
  • [44] Raschka S, 2018, MODEL EVALUATION MOD, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1811.12808
  • [45] The CART decision tree for mining data streams
    Rutkowski, Leszek
    Jaworski, Maciej
    Pietruczuk, Lena
    Duda, Piotr
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 266 : 1 - 15
  • [46] A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling
    Speiser, Jaime Lynn
    Miller, Michael E.
    Tooze, Janet
    Ip, Edward
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 134 : 93 - 101
  • [47] Reconsidering the encoding of data in physics education research
    Springuel, R. Padraic
    Wittmann, Michael C.
    Thompson, John R.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (02):
  • [48] Stone M., 1978, Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik, Series Statistics, V9, P127, DOI 10.1080/02331887808801414
  • [49] Modernizing use of regression models in physics education research: A review of hierarchical linear modeling
    Van Dusen, Ben
    Nissen, Jayson
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (02):
  • [50] A comparative analysis of regression and neural networks for university admissions
    Walczak, S
    Sincich, T
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1999, 119 (1-2) : 1 - 20