Assessing water quality of an ecologically critical urban canal incorporating machine learning approaches

被引:22
作者
Sajib, Abdul Majed [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Diganta, Mir Talas Mahammad [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Moniruzzaman, Md [5 ]
Rahman, Azizur [6 ,7 ]
Dabrowski, Tomasz [8 ]
Uddin, Md Galal [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Olbert, Agnieszka I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Galway, Coll Sci & Engn, Sch Engn, Galway, Ireland
[2] Univ Galway, Ryan Inst, Galway, Ireland
[3] Univ Galway, MaREI Res Ctr, Galway, Ireland
[4] Univ Galway, Ecohydroinformat Res Grp EHIRG, Civil Engn, Galway, Ireland
[5] Jagannath Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[6] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Comp Math & Engn, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
[7] Charles Sturt Univ, Gulbali Inst Agr Water & Environm, Wagga Wagga, Australia
[8] Marine Inst, Rinville, Ireland
关键词
Surface water quality; Machine learning; Water quality index; Model sensitivity; Model uncertainty; RMS-WQI Model; FEATURE-SELECTION; RIVER; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; INDEX; PREDICTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102514
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study assessed water quality (WQ) in Tongi Canal, an ecologically critical and economically important urban canal in Bangladesh. The researchers employed the Root Mean Square Water Quality Index (RMS-WQI) model, utilizing seven WQ indicators, including temperature, dissolve oxygen, electrical conductivity, lead, cadmium, and iron to calculate the water quality index (WQI) score. The results showed that most of the water sampling locations showed poor WQ, with many indicators violating Bangladesh's environmental conservation regulations. This study employed eight machine learning algorithms, where the Gaussian process regression (GPR) model demonstrated superior performance (training RMSE = 1.77, testing RMSE = 0.0006) in predicting WQI scores. To validate the GPR model's performance, several performance measures, including the coefficient of determination (R2), the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), the model efficiency factor (MEF), Z statistics, and Taylor diagram analysis, were employed. The GPR model exhibited higher sensitivity (R2 = 1.0) and efficiency (NSE = 1.0, MEF = 0.0) in predicting WQ. The analysis of model uncertainty (standard uncertainty = 7.08 +/- 0.9025; expanded uncertainty = 7.08 +/- 1.846) indicates that the RMS-WQI model holds potential for assessing the WQ of inland waterbodies. These findings indicate that the RMS-WQI model could be an effective approach for assessing inland waters across Bangladesh. The study's results showed that most of the WQ indicators did not meet the recommended guidelines, indicating that the water in the Tongi Canal is unsafe and unsuitable for various purposes. The study's implications extend beyond the Tongi Canal and could contribute to WQ management initiatives across Bangladesh.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Assessing the impact of reverse osmosis plant operations on water quality index improvement through machine learning approaches and health risk assessment [J].
Abbasi, Fariba ;
Kazemi, Azadeh ;
Badeenezhad, Ahmad ;
Moazamfard, Mostafa ;
Armand, Raham ;
Mohammadpour, Amin .
RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2025, 25
[42]   Machine learning approaches to characterize the obesogenic urban exposome [J].
Ohanyan, Haykanush ;
Portengen, Lutzen ;
Huss, Anke ;
Traini, Eugenio ;
Beulens, Joline W. J. ;
Hoek, Gerard ;
Lakerveld, Jeroen ;
Vermeulen, Roel .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 158
[43]   Machine learning approaches for seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings: A comparative study with analytic hierarchy process [J].
Asadollahzadeh, Danesh ;
Behnam, Behrouz .
PROGRESS IN DISASTER SCIENCE, 2025, 25
[44]   Machine learning framework for predicting water quality classification [J].
Sangwan, Vinita ;
Bhardwaj, Rashmi .
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (11) :4499-4521
[45]   Spatially adaptive machine learning models for predicting water quality in Hong Kong [J].
Wang, Qiaoli ;
Li, Zijun ;
Cai, Jiannan ;
Zhang, Mengsheng ;
Liu, Zida ;
Xu, Yu ;
Li, Rongrong .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 622
[46]   Machine learning methods for better water quality prediction [J].
Ahmed, Ali Najah ;
Othman, Faridah Binti ;
Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin ;
Ibrahim, Rusul Khaleel ;
Fai, Chow Ming ;
Hossain, Md Shabbir ;
Ehteram, Mohammad ;
Elshafie, Ahmed .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 578
[47]   Secure water quality prediction system using machine learning and blockchain technologies [J].
Jenifel, M. Geetha .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 350
[48]   Machine learning algorithms for efficient water quality prediction [J].
Mourade Azrour ;
Jamal Mabrouki ;
Ghizlane Fattah ;
Azedine Guezzaz ;
Faissal Aziz .
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2022, 8 :2793-2801
[49]   Machine learning algorithms for efficient water quality prediction [J].
Azrour, Mourade ;
Mabrouki, Jamal ;
Fattah, Ghizlane ;
Guezzaz, Azedine ;
Aziz, Faissal .
MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (02) :2793-2801
[50]   Machine Learning, Urban Water Resources Management and Operating Policy [J].
Rozos, Evangelos .
RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (04)