Structuring Research Related to Dynamic Risk Management for Autonomous Systems

被引:1
作者
Adler, Rasmus [1 ]
Reich, Jan [1 ]
Hawkins, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer IESE, Kaiserslautern, Germany
[2] Univ York, York, England
来源
COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2023 WORKSHOPS | 2023年 / 14182卷
关键词
Dynamic Risk Management; Dynamic Assurance; Safety; Autonomous Systems; Artificial Intelligence; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-40953-0_30
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Conventional safety engineering is not sufficient to deal with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Systems (AS). Some authors propose dynamic safety approaches to deal with the challenges related to AI and AS. These approaches are referred to as dynamic risk management, dynamic safety management, dynamic assurance, or runtime certification [4]. These dynamic safety approaches are related to each other and the research in this field is increasing. In this paper, we structure the research challenges and solution approaches in order to explain why dynamic risk management is needed for dependability of autonomous systems. We will present 5 research areas in this large research field and name for each research area some concrete approaches or standardization activities. We hope the problem decomposition helps to foster effective research collaboration and enables researchers to better navigate the challenges surrounding dynamic risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Adler R., 2013, Dissertation
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, ISO/IEC FDIS 23894
  • [3] Dynamic Assurance Cases: A Pathway to Trusted Autonomy
    Asaadi, Erfan
    Denney, Ewen
    Menzies, Jonathan
    Pai, Ganesh J.
    Petroff, Dimo
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2020, 53 (12) : 35 - 46
  • [4] Bootstrapping confidence in future safety from past safe operation
    Bishop, Peter
    Povyakalo, Andrey
    Strigini, Lorenzo
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 33RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE RELIABILITY ENGINEERING (ISSRE 2022), 2022, : 97 - 108
  • [5] Dynamic Safety Cases for Through-life Safety Assurance
    Denney, Ewen
    Pai, Ganesh
    Habli, Ibrahim
    [J]. 2015 IEEE/ACM 37TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL 2, 2015, : 587 - 590
  • [6] DIN Spec homepage, DIN SPEC 92005 Artificial Intelligence-Uncertainty quantification in machine learning
  • [7] A Conceptual Safety Supervisor Definition and Evaluation Framework for Autonomous Systems
    Feth, Patrik
    Schneider, Daniel
    Adler, Rasmus
    [J]. COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2017, 2017, 10488 : 135 - 148
  • [8] Architectural Patterns for Handling Runtime Uncertainty of Data-Driven Models in Safety-Critical Perception
    Gross, Janek
    Adler, Rasmus
    Klaes, Michael
    Reich, Jan
    Joeckel, Lisa
    Gansch, Roman
    [J]. COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2022, 2022, 13414 : 284 - 297
  • [9] Hawkins R., 2023, P 42 INT C COMP SAF
  • [10] Henne M., 2020, SAFEAI WORKSH AAAI C