Smart cities at the intersection of public governance paradigms for sustainability

被引:2
作者
Grossi, Giuseppe [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Welinder, Olga [4 ]
机构
[1] Kristianstad Univ, Kristianstad, Sweden
[2] Kozminski Univ, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Nord Univ, Bodo, Norway
[4] Copenhagen Business Sch, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[5] Kristianstad Univ, Elmetorpsvagen15,SE 46, S-29139 Kristianstad, Sweden
关键词
public governance; smart cities; sustainability; CITY GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1177/00420980241227807
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a research domain, the smart city keeps growing, despite the remaining contradictions and ambiguity related to its conceptual aspects. We propose to dig deeper into the complex socio-technical nature of the smart city and examine the concept through the lens of different public governance paradigms, therefore aligning it with the sustainability outcomes. Embracing interrelated dimensions of humans, technologies and organisations, the smart city can be viewed through the intersection of public governance paradigms (digital governance, collaborative governance and networks). The case of the smart city initiative of Tampere in Finland serves as an empirical illustration of how the proposed conceptual model might be applied in practice. Providing a novel approach to the smart city from a public management perspective, this model would allow policymakers to acquire a more comprehensive understanding of smart city governance and its multi-dimensional outcomes, in terms of social, environmental and economic sustainability. This approach enables the unlocking of the potential to generate multiple values for each group of actors and ensure more effective integration of smart initiatives, policies and projects, based on the public governance paradigms.
引用
收藏
页码:2011 / 2023
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] 6Aika, 2014, SMART CIT WORK TOG
  • [2] Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers
    Agranoff, Robert
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 : 56 - 65
  • [3] Collaborative governance in theory and practice
    Ansell, Chris
    Gash, Alison
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) : 543 - 571
  • [4] The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems
    Ansell, Christopher
    Sorensen, Eva
    Torfing, Jacob
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 23 (07) : 949 - 960
  • [5] Governmentality and performance for the smart city
    Argento, Daniela
    Grossi, Giuseppe
    Jaaskelainen, Aki
    Servalli, Stefania
    Suomala, Petri
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2019, 33 (01): : 204 - 232
  • [6] Bolivar MPR., 2015, TRANSFORMING CITY GO
  • [7] Smart city governance: exploring the institutional work of multiple actors towards collaboration
    Broccardo, Laura
    Culasso, Francesca
    Mauro, Sara Giovanna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2019, 32 (04) : 367 - 387
  • [8] Translating sustainable and smart city strategies into performance measurement systems
    Brorstrom, Sara
    Argento, Daniela
    Grossi, Giuseppe
    Thomasson, Anna
    Almqvist, Roland
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (03) : 193 - 202
  • [9] Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation
    Bryson, John
    Sancino, Alessandro
    Benington, John
    Sorensen, Eva
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 19 (05) : 640 - 654
  • [10] Provincialising smart urbanism in Taipei: The smart city as a strategy for urban regime transition
    Chang, I-Chun Catherine
    Jou, Sue-Ching
    Chung, Ming-Kuang
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2021, 58 (03) : 559 - 580