Consultation not Contestation: Brazilian civil society in EU-Mercosur Association Agreement negotiations

被引:1
作者
Del Pupo, Emilio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Cultures, Unioninkatu 38, Helsinki 00170, Finland
关键词
Brazilian civil society; interregional trade; Mercosur; European Union; modes of participation; FREE-TRADE; GOVERNANCE; INTERREGIONALISM; POLITICIZATION; PARTICIPATION; LEGITIMACY; AMERICA; FTAA;
D O I
10.1080/17448689.2023.2264404
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to explore the role of Brazilian civil society in interregional trade between 2003 and 2020, with a focus on negotiations between the European Union and the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). I draw on document analysis from Mercosur's online archives and from interviews with actors engaged in trade at the time analyzed, supported by the Modes of Participation framework. This approach allowed for a uniquely critical perspective on Mercosur's participatory structure. I aim to find out: who was represented in negotiations; what forms of participation were permitted; and who were the actors who pushed for the creation of participatory channels. My hypothesis is that, by establishing modes of participation, government elites have filtered out dissenting voices from channels which could potentially influence negotiations, while civil society representatives created participatory spaces in response to perceived limitations. Results show that societal dissent was contained first by a proliferation of channels and mechanisms for limited participation from 2003, and from 2016 onwards by limiting access to government officials and reports on negotiating rounds. Furthermore, it was found that contentious actors, excluded from negotiations, created their own spaces for participation, such as drafting collective statements and lobbying Brazilian congresspeople.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 73
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Alemany C., 2017, PARTICIPACION SOCIAL, P151
[2]  
ALOP, 2010, REL UN EUR MERCOSUR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, FRENTE BRASILEIRA AC
[4]   Does Democratization Alter the Policy Process? Trade Policymaking in Brazil [J].
Armijo, Leslie Elliott ;
Kearney, Christine A. .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2008, 15 (05) :991-1017
[5]   Politicization and Regional Integration in Latin America: Implications for EU-MERCOSUR Negotiations? [J].
Bianculli, Andrea C. .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2020, 8 (01) :254-265
[6]   Regulatory governance regimes and interregionalism: exploring the dynamics of EU-Mercosur negotiations [J].
Bianculli, Andrea C. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN STUDIES, 2016, 41 (02) :173-196
[7]  
Botto M., 2014, MOVIMIENTOS SOCIALES
[8]   The challenges of economic integration in Latin America: searching for consensus in contexts of globalization. The case of MERCOSUR (1991-2019) [J].
Botto, Mercedes .
GLOBALIZATIONS, 2022, 19 (04) :555-570
[9]  
Botto M, 2011, INT POLIT ECON NEW, P89
[10]  
Chodor T., 2015, NEOLIBERAL HEGEMONY, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444684, DOI 10.1057/9781137444684]