An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator

被引:1
作者
Sohn, James J. [1 ]
Lim, Sara [1 ]
Das, Indra J. [1 ]
Yadav, Poonam [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Northwestern Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 27卷
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging guided radiation; therapy; MRIdian; QA; Magphan; ACR alternatives; MR-LINAC; RADIATION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Periodic imaging quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MRL) is critical. The feasibility of a new MRL imaging phantom used for QA in the low field was evaluated with auto-mated image analysis of various parameters for accuracy and reproducibility. Methods and materials: The new MRL imaging phantom was scanned across every 30 degrees of the gantry, having the on/off state of the linac in a low-field MRL system using three magnetic resonance imaging sequences: true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP), T1 weighted (T1W), and T2 weighted (T2W). The DICOM files were used to calculate the imaging parameters: geometric distortion, uniformity, resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and laser alignment. The point spread function (PSF) and edge spread function (ESF) were also calculated for resolution analysis. Results: The phantom data showed a small standard deviation -and high consistency for each imaging parameter. The highest variability in data was observed with the true fast imaging sequence at the calibration angle, which was expected because of low resolution and short scan time (25 sec). The mean magnitude of the largest distortion measured within 200 mm diameter with TrueFISP was 0.31 & PLUSMN; 0.05 mm. The PSF, ESF, signal uni-formity, and SNR measurements remained consistent. Laser alignment traditional offsets and angular deviation remained consistent. Conclusions: The new MRL imaging phantom is reliable, reproducible, time effective, and easy to use for a 0.35 T MRL system. The results promise a more streamlined, time-saving, and error-free QA process for low-field MRL adapted in our clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Delivered dose quantification in prostate radiotherapy using online 3D cine imaging and treatment log files on a combined 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system
    Kontaxis, Charis
    Keizer, Daan M. de Muinck
    Kerkmeijer, Linda G. W.
    Willigenburg, Thomas
    den Hartogh, Mariska D.
    van Zyp, Jochem R. N. van der Voort
    de Groot-van Breugel, Eline N.
    Hes, Jochem
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
    de Boer, Hans C. J.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 : 23 - 29
  • [22] Feasibility and accuracy of quantitative imaging on a 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator
    Kooreman, Ernst S.
    van Houdt, Petra J.
    Nowee, Marlies E.
    van Pelt, Vivian W. J.
    Tijssen, Rob H. N.
    Paulson, Eric S.
    Gurney-Champion, Oliver J.
    Wang, Jihong
    Koetsveld, Folkert
    van Buuren, Laurens D.
    ter Beek, Leon C.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 156 - 162
  • [23] Copper T 380A IUD and magnetic resonance imaging
    Zieman, Miriam
    Kanal, Emanuel
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (02) : 93 - 95
  • [24] Fast magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) using wavelet encoding and parallel imaging: In vitro results
    Fu, Yao
    Serrai, Hacene
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2011, 211 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [25] Predictive value of 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer: A pilot study
    Simpson, Garrett
    Spieler, Benjamin
    Dogan, Nesrin
    Portelance, Lorraine
    Mellon, Eric A.
    Kwon, Deukwoo
    Ford, John C.
    Yang Fei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (08) : 3682 - 3690
  • [26] Comprehensive Image Quality Evaluation and Motion Phantom Studies of an Ultra-Fast (6-Second) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging System on a Ring Gantry Linear Accelerator
    Zhao, Hui
    Nelson, Geoff
    Sarkar, Vikren
    Oare, Courtney
    Szegedi, Martin
    St James, Sara
    Kunz, Jeremy
    Price, Ryan
    Huang, Y. Jessica
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 10 (02)
  • [27] Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging on hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerators: Perspective on technical and clinical validation
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Ege, Matthias
    Nachbar, Marcel
    Moennich, David
    Gani, Cihan
    Zips, Daniel
    Boeke, Simon
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 69 - 73
  • [28] Adaptive Sampling and Non Linear Reconstruction for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Placidi, Giuseppe
    Avola, Danilo
    Cinque, Luigi
    Macchiarelli, Guido
    Petracca, Andrea
    Spezialetti, Matteo
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF OBJECTS PRESENTED IN IMAGES: FUNDAMENTALS, METHODS, AND APPLICATIONS, 2014, 8641 : 24 - +
  • [29] ACPSEM position paper: the safety of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators
    Cook, Nick
    Shelton, Nikki
    Gibson, Stephen
    Barnes, Peter
    Alinaghi-Zadeh, Reza
    Jameson, Michael G.
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2023, 46 (01) : 19 - 43
  • [30] Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of water-fat magnetic resonance imaging in a phantom and healthy volunteer
    Corbeau, Anouk
    van Gastel, Pien
    Wielopolski, Piotr A.
    de Jong, Nick
    Creutzberg, Carien L.
    Heide, Uulke A. van der
    Boer, Stephanie M. de
    Astreinidou, Eleftheria
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 32