Cost Analysis of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection: How Much Does Quality Cost?

被引:2
|
作者
Bashir, Mohamad [1 ,9 ]
Jubouri, Matti [2 ]
Patel, Ravi [3 ]
Geragotellis, Alexander [4 ]
Tan, Sven ZCP. [5 ]
Bailey, Damian M. [6 ]
Mohammed, Idhrees [7 ]
Velayudhan, Bashi [7 ]
Williams, Ian M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Velindre Univ NHS Trust, Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Hlth Educ & Improvement Wales HEIW, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Univ York, Hull York Med Sch, York, England
[3] Shrewsbury & Telford Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Shrewsbury, England
[4] Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, London, England
[6] Univ South Wales, Fac Life Sci & Educ, Neurovasc Res Lab, Pontypridd, Wales
[7] SIMS Hosp, Inst Cardiac & Aort Disorders ICAD, SRM Inst Med Sci, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[8] Univ Hosp Wales, Dept Vasc Surg, Cardiff, Wales
[9] Velindre Univ NHS Trust, Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Hlth Educ & Improvement Wales HEIW, Cefn Coed Rd, Cardiff CF15 7QZ, Wales
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
GRAFT; MULTICENTER; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.043
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening medical emergency that affects an estimated 3-4 people per 100,000 annually, with 40% of cases classified as type B AD (TBAD). TBAD can be further classified as being complicated (co-TBAD) or uncomplicated (un-TBAD) based on the presence or absence of certain features such as malperfusion and rupture. TBAD can be managed conservatively with optimal medical therapy (OMT), or invasively with open surgical repair (OSR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), depending on several factors such as type of TBAD and its clinical acuity. The cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefit profile, of these strategies must be given equal consideration. However, TBAD studies featuring cost analyses are limited within the literature. This narrative review aims to address the gap in the literature on cost-effectiveness of TBAD treatments by providing an overview of cost analyses comparing OMT with TEVAR in un-TBAD and TEVAR with OSR in coTBAD. Another aim is to provide a market analysis of the commercially available TEVAR devices. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using several search engines including PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase to identify and extract relevant studies. Results: Several TEVAR devices are available commercially on the global market costing $12,000-19,495. Nevertheless, the Terumo Aortic RELAY & REG; stent graft seems to be the most cost-effective, yielding highly favourable clinical outcomes. Despite the higher initial cost of TEVAR, evidence in the literature strongly suggest that it is superior to OMT for un-TBAD on the long-term. In addition, TEVAR is well established in the literature as being gold-standard repair technique for co-TBAD, replacing OSR by offering a more optimal cost-benefit profile through lower costs and improved results. Conclusions: The introduction of TEVAR has revolutionized the field of aortovascular surgery by offering a highly efficacious and long-term cost-effective treatment for TBAD.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 44
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection after renal transplantation
    Shu, Chang
    Xiong, QingGen
    Qiu, Jian
    Luo, MingYao
    Fang, Kun
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (53) : 91628 - 91635
  • [2] Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair for complicated type B aortic dissection
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    Kische, Stephan
    Ince, Hueseyin
    Fattori, Rossella
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (05) : 1529 - 1533
  • [3] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Acute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection
    Trimarchi, Santi
    Eagle, Kim A.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (02) : 192 - 194
  • [4] Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Higashigawa, Takatoshi
    Kato, Noriyuki
    Chino, Shuji
    Hashimoto, Takashi
    Shimpo, Hideto
    Tokui, Toshiya
    Mizumoto, Toru
    Sato, Tomoaki
    Okabe, Manabu
    Sakuma, Hajime
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 102 (05) : 1536 - 1542
  • [5] Aortic Morphologic Findings After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection
    Sigman, Michael M.
    Palmer, Owen P.
    Ham, Sung W.
    Cunningham, Mark
    Weaver, Fred A.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (09) : 977 - 983
  • [6] Aortic Arch Debranching and Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) for Type B Aortic Dissection
    Bashir, Mohamad
    Jubouri, Matti
    Surkhi, Abdelaziz O.
    Sadeghipour, Parham
    Pouraliakbar, Hamidreza
    Rabiee, Parham
    Jolfayi, Amir Ghaffari
    Mohebbi, Bahram
    Moosavi, Jamal
    Babaei, Mohammadreza
    Afrooghe, Arya
    Ghoorchian, Ehsan
    Awad, Wael I.
    Velayudhan, Bashi
    Mohammed, Idhrees
    Bailey, Damian M.
    Williams, Ian M.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 99 : 320 - 331
  • [7] Reintervention after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Cheng, Li
    Xiang, Dongqiao
    Zhang, Shan
    Zheng, Chuansheng
    Wu, Xiaoyan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [8] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of ruptured acute type B aortic dissection
    Chino, Shuji
    Kato, Noriyuki
    Nakajima, Ken
    Hashimoto, Takashi
    Higashigawa, Takatoshi
    Ouchi, Takafumi
    Kato, Hiroaki
    Yamamoto, Naoki
    Ito, Hisato
    Maze, Yasumi
    Tokui, Toshiya
    Sakuma, Hajime
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (04) : 321 - 327
  • [9] Early Open and Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Wilkinson, D. Andrew
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Williams, David M.
    Dasika, Narasimham L.
    Deeb, G. Michael
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 96 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [10] The Role of Thoracic Endovascular Repair in Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection
    Burke, Christopher R.
    Bavaria, Joseph E.
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 32 (01) : 21 - 24