Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Personalized, Teleretinal-Inclusive Screening Policy for Diabetic Retinopathy via Markov Modeling

被引:1
作者
Dorali, Poria [1 ]
Shahmoradi, Zahed [2 ]
Weng, Christina Y. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Lee, Taewoo [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Ind Engn, Houston, TX USA
[2] UTHealth Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Dept Management Policy & Community Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[3] Ben Taub Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Ind Engn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] 1977 Butler Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; UNITED-STATES; RURAL HEALTH; PROGRAM; CARE; TELEMEDICINE; ASSOCIATION; DISPARITIES; GUIDELINES; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oret.2023.01.001
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Although teleretinal imaging has proved effective in increasing population-level screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR), there is a lack of quantitative understanding of how to incorporate teleretinal imaging into existing screening guidelines. We develop a mathematical model to determine personalized DR screening recommendations that utilize teleretinal imaging and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the personalized screening policy.Design: A partially observable Markov decision process is employed to determine personalized screening recommendations based on patient compliance, willingness to pay, and A1C level. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of patient-specific factors on personalized screening policy. The cost-effectiveness of identified screening policies was evaluated via hidden-Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation on a data-based hypothetical cohort.Participants: Screening policies were simulated for a hypothetical cohort of 500 000 patients with param-eters based on the literature and electronic medical records of 2457 patients who received teleretinal imaging from 2013 to 2020 from the Harris Health System.Methods: Population-based mathematical modeling study. Interventions included dilated fundus examina-tions referred to as clinical screening, teleretinal imaging, and wait and watch recommendations.Main Outcome Measures: Personalized screening recommendations based on patient-specific factors. Accumulated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost (USD) per patient under different screening policies. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to compare different policies.Results: For the base cohort, on average, teleretinal imaging was recommended 86.7% of the time over each patient's lifetime. The model-based personalized policy dominated other standardized policies, generating more QALY gains and cost savings for at least 57% of the base cohort. Similar outcomes were observed in sensitivity analyses of the base cohort and the Harris Health-specific cohort and rural population scenario analysis.Conclusions: A mathematical model was developed as a decision support tool to identify a personalized screening policy that incorporates both teleretinal imaging and clinical screening and adapts to patient charac-teristics. Compared with current standardized policies, the model-based policy significantly reduces costs, whereas it is performing comparably, if not better, in terms of QALY gain. A personalized approach to DR screening has significant potential benefits that warrant further exploration.Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology Retina 2023;7:532-542 & COPY; 2023 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 542
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of telemedicine to evaluate diabetic retinopathy in a prison population [J].
Aoki, N ;
Dunn, K ;
Fukui, T ;
Beck, JR ;
Schull, WJ ;
Li, HK .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (05) :1095-1101
[2]   Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making: A Markov decision process approach [J].
Bennett, Casey C. ;
Hauser, Kris .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (01) :9-19
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ABOUT US
[4]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2022, BILL COD REM IM RET
[5]  
Cha Amy E, 2019, NCHS Data Brief, P1
[6]  
Chamberlain PD, 2018, DISSERTATION
[7]   Adherence to American diabetes association standards of care by rural health care providers [J].
Coon, P ;
Zulkowski, K .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (12) :2224-2229
[8]   Implementation and Evaluation of a Large-Scale Teleretinal Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program in the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services [J].
Daskivich, Lauren P. ;
Vasquez, Carolina ;
Martinez, Carlos, Jr. ;
Tseng, Chi-Hong ;
Mangione, Carol M. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (05) :642-649
[9]   Accuracy of Detection and Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema Using Teleretinal Screening [J].
Date, Rishabh C. ;
Shen, Kevin L. ;
Shah, Beena M. ;
Sigalos-Rivera, Mara A. ;
Chu, Yvonne, I ;
Weng, Christina Y. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA, 2019, 3 (04) :343-349
[10]  
Date Rishabh C, 2019, Int Ophthalmol Clin, V59, P39, DOI 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000246