Worldviews, values and perspectives towards the future of the livestock sector

被引:7
作者
Blair, Kirsty Joanna [1 ,2 ]
Moran, Dominic [1 ]
Alexander, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Global Acad Agr & Food Secur, Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Drummond St, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, Scotland
关键词
Sustainability; Livestock; Worldviews; Values; MEAT; CONSUMPTION; CONSUMERS; PREFERENCES; FOODS; EAT;
D O I
10.1007/s10460-023-10469-9
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The livestock sector is under increasing pressure to respond to numerous sustainability and health challenges related to the production and consumption of livestock products. However, political and market barriers and conflicting worldviews and values across the environmental, socio-economic and political domains have led to considerable sector inertia, and government inaction. The processes that lead to the formulation of perspectives in this space, and that shape action (or inaction), are currently under-researched. This paper presents results of a mixed methods exploration of the influence of environmental worldviews, values, and demographic factors on perspectives towards the future of the livestock sector. The approach combines survey and interview data derived from a sample of livestock representatives (N = 307). Respondents with higher pro-environmental, ecocentric and relational worldviews and values favour more behaviour-oriented solutions. Those with lower pro-environmental and higher techno-centric worldviews and values favour technological solutions to improve the efficiency of production and to enable continued patterns of meat consumption. Demographic variation and qualitative data emphasise the need to recognise cultural and geographic nuance in narratives. This study improves our understanding of the processes that lead to the formulation of perspectives, enabling the development of more holistic solutions that acknowledge all voices in an increasingly polarised debate. Adopting more pluralistic, relational methodologies will therefore be paramount in developing solutions for sustainable livestock futures.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 108
页数:18
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Abraha F., 2016, THESIS HAWASSA U
[2]  
ACE (Animal Charity Evaluators), 2017, CLEAN MEAT CULT MEAT
[3]   Animal source foods: Sustainability problem or malnutrition and sustainability solution? Perspective matters [J].
Adesogan, Adegbola T. ;
Havelaar, Arie H. ;
McKune, Sarah L. ;
Eilitta, Marjatta ;
Dahl, Geoffrey E. .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 25
[4]   Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system [J].
Alexander, Peter ;
Brown, Calum ;
Arneth, Almut ;
Finnigan, John ;
Moran, Dominic ;
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 153 :190-200
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The News
[6]   Concentrating vs. spreading our footprint: how to meet humanity's needs at least cost to nature [J].
Balmford, A. .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2021, 315 (02) :79-109
[7]  
Bawden Richard., 2006, Systems concepts in evaluation: an Expert Anthology, P35
[8]   Cognitive Shocks: Scientific Discovery and Mobilization [J].
Bergstrand, Kelly .
SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2014, 23 (03) :320-343
[9]   (Dis)agreement over what? The challenge of quantifying environmental worldviews [J].
Bernstein, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (02) :169-177
[10]   Technological, Regulatory, and Ethical Aspects of In Vitro Meat: A Future Slaughter-Free Harvest [J].
Bhat, Zuhaib F. ;
Morton, James D. ;
Mason, Susan L. ;
Bekhit, Alaa El-Din A. ;
Bhat, Hina F. .
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, 2019, 18 (04) :1192-1208