Does China's low-carbon action reduce pollution emissions? A quasi-natural experiment based on the low-carbon city construction

被引:18
作者
Gao, Yuqiang [1 ]
Lu, Yuchen [1 ]
Su, Chi-Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China
[2] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Dalian 116025, Peoples R China
关键词
Low-carbon city construction; Pollution emissions; Progress of green technology; Upgrading of industrial structure; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; KUZNETS CURVE; PANEL-DATA; COMPETITIVENESS; HYPOTHESIS; GROWTH; ZONES;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-24135-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To achieve the goal of "carbon peak and carbon neutrality", it is crucial for China to effectively control environmental pollution in low-carbon action (LCA). Based on the evidence from 283 cities in China from 2007 to 2019, the difference-in-differences (DID) method is applied to explore the impact of LCA on pollutant emissions represented by the pilot of low-carbon city construction (LCCC) in China. The main findings are as follows. First of all, the LCCC suppresses pollution emissions, and the basic conclusions are still stable after endogenous treatment and robustness testing. Secondly, the mechanism analysis reveals that the main path of LCCC affecting pollution reduction comes from the progress of green technology and the upgrading of industrial structure. Finally, the heterogeneity analysis shows that the pollution reduction effect of the LCCC is better in the eastern region and cities with higher level of green economy development. Based on the policy standpoint of environmental protection, the LCCC has opened up a reasonable exploration path for China and other countries in the world to carry out effective pollution reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:27013 / 27029
页数:17
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[2]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[3]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[4]   Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China [J].
Cai, Xiqian ;
Lu, Yi ;
Wu, Mingqin ;
Yu, Linhui .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 :73-85
[5]   Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme [J].
Chan, Hei Sing ;
Li, Shanjun ;
Zhang, Fan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 :1056-1064
[6]   The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: Theory and empirical evidence from China [J].
Chen, Heyin ;
Hao, Yu ;
Li, Jingwei ;
Song, Xiaojie .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 :200-214
[7]   Population distribution and urbanization on both sides of the Hu Huanyong Line: Answering the Premier's question [J].
Chen Mingxing ;
Gong Yinghua ;
Li Yang ;
Lu Dadao ;
Zhang Hua .
JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 26 (11) :1593-1610
[8]  
Chen Y., 2020, Truth Seek, P46, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1007-8487.2020.02.005
[9]   The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China [J].
Chen, Zhao ;
Kahn, Matthew E. ;
Liu, Yu ;
Wang, Zhi .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 88 :468-485
[10]   Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China's pilot low-carbon city initiative [J].
Cheng, Jinhua ;
Yi, Jiahui ;
Dai, Sheng ;
Xiong, Yan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 :1158-1170