Flood Influence Characteristics of Rail Transit Engineering of Tunnel, Viaduct, and Roadbed through Urban Flood Detention Areas

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Hui [1 ]
Shen, Xizhong [2 ,3 ]
Yuan, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Changjiang River Sci Res Inst, Inst River Res, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China
[2] Yellow River Conservancy Commiss, Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Water Resources, Res Ctr Levee Safety & Disaster Prevent, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
关键词
urban flood detention area; rail transit; flood impact; flood diversion; flood recession; mathematical model of two-dimensional water flow; HAZARD;
D O I
10.3390/su15097357
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many subways, light rails, and trains travel through urban flood retention regions via tunnels, viaducts, and roadbeds; however, less is known about the flood influence laws of rail transportation by the crossing ways. Rail transit projects were chosen as research objects for the ordinary subway, light rail, and railway passing through urban flood detention areas in Wuhan, and the flood influence characteristics were systematically compared for the three crossing ways. The study revealed that crossing ways primarily affected the flood storage volume occupied per unit length of lines and that the flood influence of rail projects on flood detention areas was proportionate to the flood storage volume occupied per unit length of lines. Specifically, the flood storage volume occupied per unit length of tunnels was about 1/8.9 that of viaducts and 1/19.7 that of roadbeds. Moreover, the tunnel way had the least influence on the main aspects, such as flood control, floods on engineering, and engineering-related aspects; the roadbed-based way had the largest; and the viaduct way was in the middle. These findings may provide technical support for the decision-making, engineering planning, construction, and management of rail transit and other projects in urban flood detention areas.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 501812018 GBT
[2]   Comparison of hydrodynamic models of different complexities to model floods with emergency storage areas [J].
Chatterjee, Chandranath ;
Foerster, Saskia ;
Bronstert, Axel .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (24) :4695-4709
[3]   Stochastic modelling of groundwater flow for hazard assessment along the underground infrastructures in Milan (northern Italy) [J].
Colombo, L. ;
Gattinoni, P. ;
Scesi, L. .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 79 :110-120
[4]  
General Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design Ministry of Water Resources, 2013, 502862013 GB
[5]  
General Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Planning Design of Ministry of Water Resources Yangtze River Survey Planning and Design Institute of Yangtze River Water Resources Commission, 2009, 504872008 GB
[6]   Treatment of Storm Water from Agricultural Catchment in Pilot Scale Constructed Wetland [J].
Grinberga, Linda ;
Lauva, Didzis ;
Lagzdins, Ainis .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 25 (01) :640-649
[7]  
Han P., 2012, TRANSP STAND, V23, P25, DOI [10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2012.23.010, DOI 10.16503/J.CNKI.2095-9931.2012.23.010]
[8]   Flood impacts on urban transit and accessibility-A case study of Kinshasa [J].
He, Yiyi ;
Thies, Stephan ;
Avner, Paolo ;
Rentschler, Jun .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 96
[9]  
Huaihe River Water Conservancy Commission of Ministry of Water Resources, 2021, 8082021 SLT HUA RIV
[10]   Integrated Framework for Assessment of Time-Variant Flood Fragility of Bridges Using Deep Learning Neural Networks [J].
Khandel, Omid ;
Soliman, Mohamed .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2021, 27 (01)