Life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis to determine the performance of 3D printed cement mortars and geopolymers

被引:26
作者
Yoris-Nobile, Adrian, I [1 ]
Lizasoain-Arteaga, Esther [2 ]
Slebi-Acevedo, Carlos J. [1 ]
Blanco-Fernandez, Elena [1 ]
Alonso-Canon, Sara [1 ]
Indacoechea-Vega, Irune [1 ]
Castro-Fresno, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cantabria, GITECO Res Grp, Santander, Spain
[2] Basque Res & Technol Alliance BRTA, Derio, Spain
关键词
3D printing; sustainable mortars; geopolymers; recycle aggregates; life cycle assessment (LCA); multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ACTIVATED SLAG CEMENT; FLY-ASH; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CONCRETE; DURABILITY; CONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/21650373.2022.2099479
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A comparison between low-clinker cement and geopolymer mortars for their application in 3 D printing is discussed in this paper. The mortars are composed of materials with low environmental impact, such as cements with low clinker content, by-products of the industry and recycled aggregates. The developed mortars were both mechanically and rheologically characterized. The environmental impact was studied by LCA. To select the most suitable dosages, MCDM analysis was applied based on cost of materials, printability and LCA. Compressive strength was considered as a normalizing parameter for both the LCA and cost. The mortars showed good printability and suitable mechanical strength, being higher in the cement mortars. The LCA showed that the geopolymer mortars have a higher environmental impact due to the use of sodium hydroxide. Likewise, MCDM revealed that low-clinker cement mortars are at the top of the ranking, due to a lower environmental impact and lower cost of materials.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 626
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Preparation of geopolymer concrete using Egyptian kaolin clay and the study of its environmental effects and economic cost
    Abbas, Rafik
    Khereby, Mona Aly
    Ghorab, Hanaa Y.
    Elkhoshkhany, N.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 22 (03) : 669 - 687
  • [2] Environmental assessment of large-scale 3D printing in construction: A comparative study between cob and concrete
    Alhumayani, Hashem
    Gomaa, Mohamed
    Soebarto, Veronica
    Jabi, Wassim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
  • [3] Andres-Valeri, 2020, SELECTION ADDITIVES
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, UNEEN1961
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2012, UNEEN15804UNEEN15
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2020, ARGOS 360
  • [8] Characterization of Ceramic-Based Construction and Demolition Waste: Use as Pozzolan in Cements
    Asensio, Eloy
    Medina, Cesar
    Frias, Moises
    Sanchez de Rojas, Maria Isabel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2016, 99 (12) : 4121 - 4127
  • [9] Investigation of early compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
    Assi, Lateef N.
    Deaver, Edward
    ElBatanouny, Mohamed K.
    Ziehld, Paul
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 112 : 807 - 815
  • [10] Environmental impact assessment of fly ash and silica fume based geopolymer concrete
    Bajpai, Rishabh
    Choudhary, Kailash
    Srivastava, Anshuman
    Sangwan, Kuldip Singh
    Singh, Manpreet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 254