Making sense of pot: conceptual tools for analyzing legal cannabis policy discourse

被引:7
作者
Levesque, Gabriel [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Sociol, Room 717,Leacock Bldg,855 Sherbrooke St West, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T7, Canada
关键词
Cannabis legalization; cannabis policy discourse; discourse studies; framing analysis; PUBLIC-HEALTH; MORALITY POLICY; TOBACCO CONTROL; BIG TOBACCO; LEGALIZATION; STATE; DRUGS; WAR; COMMUNITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/19460171.2022.2044874
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In the last decade, there has been a significant surge in cannabis legalization, with Uruguay (2013), Canada (2018) and 19 U.S. states (2012-2022) having developed recreational cannabis policies. A growing literature analyzes legalization from a policymaking or public health standpoint. Yet only few studies have explored its discursive component . This article contributes to filling this gap by developing conceptual tools for cannabis policy discourse analysis. I first examine the history of cannabis policy in North America and find two main discursive clusters, i.e., moral and epistemic discourse. I then discuss existing typologies of cannabis regulation models and select that of Beauchesne, which distinguishes between three models: prohibition 2.0, public health and harm reduction, and commercialization. At the intersection of discursive clusters and these regulation models, I identify six mutually exclusive frames of cannabis policy: moral panic, medical/health, reparations/vulnerabilities, harm reduction/risk mitigation, laissez-faire/liberalism, and illicit market/revenue. .
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 23
页数:20
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [1] Rifts in the Hegemony: Swedish News Journalism on Cannabis Legalization
    Abalo, Ernesto
    [J]. JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2019, 20 (11) : 1617 - 1634
  • [2] Acker C.J., 2004, ALTERING AM CONSCIOU, P165
  • [3] Canada's provinces and territories should disclose cannabis data to support research
    Armstrong, Michael J.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 193 (10) : E341 - E342
  • [4] Normalization and denormalization in different legal contexts: Comparing cannabis and tobacco
    Asbridge, Mark
    Valleriani, Jenna
    Kwok, Judith
    Erickson, Patricia G.
    [J]. DRUGS-EDUCATION PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2016, 23 (03) : 212 - 223
  • [5] Marijuana Regulatory Frameworks in Four US States: An Analysis Against a Public Health Standard
    Barry, Rachel A.
    Glantz, Stanton A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 108 (07) : 914 - 923
  • [6] Beauchesne L., 2020, L GALISATION CANNABI
  • [7] Belenko S.R., 2000, Drugs and drug policy in America: A documentary
  • [8] Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment
    Benford, RD
    Snow, DA
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 26 : 611 - 639
  • [9] Bergeron Henri., 2014, Sociologie Politique de la Sante
  • [10] Taxing the tempted: Personal addictions, sustainable revenues and the public good
    Bird, Malcolm G.
    Dutil, Patrice
    Stoney, Christopher
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2019, : 674 - 696