SCCD: A slicing algorithm for detecting geomorphic changes on topographically complex areas based on 3D point clouds

被引:4
作者
Yang, Xin [1 ]
Hu, Jinfei [1 ]
Li, Pengfei [1 ]
Gao, Chendi [1 ]
Latifi, Hooman [2 ,3 ]
Bai, Xiao [1 ]
Gao, Jianjian [4 ]
Dang, Tianmin [5 ]
Tang, Fuquan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geomat, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
[2] K N Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Geodesy & Geomatics Engn, Dept Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, Tehran 15433, Iran
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Geog & Geol, Dept Remote Sensing, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Yellow River Conservancy Comm Minist Water Resourc, Suide Test Stn Soil & Water Conservat, Yulin 719000, Peoples R China
[5] Yellow River Basin Monitoring Ctr Water Soil Conse, Xian 710021, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LiDAR; Slicing algorithm; M3C2; algorithm; DoD algorithm; Gully headcut erosion; LOESS PLATEAU; GULLY EROSION; SOIL-EROSION; DEPOSITION VOLUMES; LASER SCANNER; LIDAR; ERROR; DEMS; REGISTRATION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2024.114022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three-dimensional (3D) point clouds are widely used for geomorphic change detection. However, the lack of efficient change-detection algorithms for complex terrain limits the use of 3D point clouds in area-wide morphological change studies. In this study, a complex terrain development process was simulated on a natural slope in the hilly and gully Loess Plateau in China using 28 runoff scouring experiments conducted in two plots. Highly precise point clouds were obtained using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) before and after each experiment. A slice contraction change detection (SCCD) algorithm was developed based on slicing, Laplacian-based contraction, and differential principles for detecting geomorphic and volumetric changes on complex terrain, and the level of detection (LoD) was derived with respect to that of the multiscale model to model the cloud comparison (M3C2) algorithm. The accuracy of SCCD was compared with that of the 3D-M3C2 algorithm (i.e., a 3D volumetric change calculation algorithm based on M3C2) and the digital elevation model (DEM) of difference (DoD) algorithm based on the measured sediment yield from the plots. The comparison was performed also under different point cloud densities and morphologies. Results showed the following: (1) The precisions of SCCD and 3D-M3C2 were comparable and considerably higher than that of DoD. The mean relative errors of SCCD, 3D-M3C2, and DoD for the two plots were 13.32% and 10.37%, 10.07% and 10.84%, and 35.30% and 27.23%, respectively. The relative error fluctuations of the three algorithms for the individual experiments followed the sequence of DoD (standard deviation (std.): 10.18) > 3D-M3C2 (std.: 8.29) > SCCD (std.: 5.79). (2) The sensitivity to point cloud density changes followed the sequence of 3D-M3C2 > SCCD > DoD as the point cloud density varied between 10,000 and 1000 points m- 2. The mean relative errors of 3D-M3C2, SCCD, and DoD for the two plots were 10.07-18.59% and 10.84-13.62%, 13.32-16.83% and 10.37-15.50%, and 35.30-38.33% and 26.52-27.26%, respectively. (3) The accuracy of 3D-M3C2 decreased significantly (p < 0.05), whereas those of SCCD and DoD either changed insignificantly (p > 0.05) or increased significantly for substantial morphologic changes. As the experiments progressed, the relative errors of 3D-M3C2, SCCD, and DoD for the two plots were 10.87-93.77% and 30.76-167.89%, 20.04-9.95% and 5.54-7.96%, and 42.49-11.94% and 3.89-4.96%, respectively. Overall, the SCCD algorithm provides a reliable means of conducting geomorphic change detection in complex terrain and thus facilitates future studies on detecting and characterizing land surface processes.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Multi-sensor point cloud data fusion for precise 3D mapping [J].
Abdelazeem, Mohamed ;
Elamin, Ahmed ;
Afifi, Akram ;
El-Rabbany, Ahmed .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2021, 24 (03) :835-844
[2]   GULLY HEAD RETREAT IN THE SUB-HUMID ETHIOPIAN HIGHLANDS: THE ENE-CHILALA CATCHMENT [J].
Addisie, Meseret B. ;
Ayele, Getaneh K. ;
Gessess, Azalu A. ;
Tilahun, Seifu A. ;
Zegeye, Assefa D. ;
Moges, Mikael M. ;
Schmitter, Petra ;
Langendoen, Eddy J. ;
Steenhuis, Tammo S. .
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (05) :1579-1588
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P SHAP MOD INT C AIX, DOI DOI 10.1109/SMI.2010.25
[4]   Skeleton extraction by mesh contraction [J].
Au, Oscar Kin-Chung ;
Tai, Chiew-Lan ;
Chu, Hung-Kuo ;
Cohen-Or, Daniel ;
Lee, Tong-Yee .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON GRAPHICS, 2008, 27 (03)
[5]   Error modeling of DEMs from topographic surveys of rivers using fuzzy inference systems [J].
Bangen, Sara ;
Hensleigh, James ;
McHugh, Peter ;
Wheaton, Joseph .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2016, 52 (02) :1176-1193
[6]   Accuracy of methods for field assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion [J].
Casali, J. ;
Loizu, J. ;
Campo, M. A. ;
De Santisteban, L. M. ;
Alvarez-Mozos, J. .
CATENA, 2006, 67 (02) :128-138
[7]   Assessment of erosion and deposition in steep mountain basins by differencing sequential digital terrain models [J].
Cavalli, Marco ;
Goldin, Beatrice ;
Comiti, Francesco ;
Brardinoni, Francesco ;
Marchi, Lorenzo .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2017, 291 :4-16
[8]   Cavern Capacity Calculation Using Terrestrial Lidar [J].
Cheng Xiaojun ;
Xiong Xinxin ;
Yang Zexin ;
Yang Rongqi .
LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2019, 56 (23)
[9]   The use of multi temporal LiDAR to assess basin-scale erosion and deposition following the catastrophic January 2011 Lockyer flood, SE Queensland, Australia [J].
Croke, Jacky ;
Todd, Peter ;
Thompson, Chris ;
Watson, Fiona ;
Denham, Robert ;
Khanal, Giri .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2013, 184 :111-126
[10]   How does co-registration affect geomorphic change estimates in multi-temporal surveys? [J].
Cucchiaro, Sara ;
Maset, Eleonora ;
Cavalli, Marco ;
Crema, Stefano ;
Marchi, Lorenzo ;
Beinat, Alberto ;
Cazorzi, Federico .
GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 57 (05) :611-632