Comparison of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Bupivacaine in Short Gynecological Procedures: A Randomized Double-Blind Study

被引:0
作者
Khurana, Bisman Jeet Kaur [1 ]
Choudhary, Sujata [2 ]
Singhal, Meghna [3 ]
Rautela, Rajesh S. [4 ]
Salhotra, Rashmi [4 ]
Singh, Alpana [5 ]
Meena, Seema [6 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Chandigarh, India
[2] Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll & Safdarjung Hosp, Anesthesiol, New Delhi, India
[3] Maulana Azad Med Coll, Anesthesiol, New Delhi, India
[4] Univ Coll Med Sci & Guru Teg Bahadur GTB Hosp, Anesthesiol, New Delhi, India
[5] Univ Coll Med Sci & Guru Teg Bahadur GTB Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol, New Delhi, India
[6] Max Hosp Patparganj, Anesthesiol & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
gynecology surgery; intrathecal chloroprocaine; 0.25% bupivacaine; spinal anesthesia; day case surgery; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; 2-CHLOROPROCAINE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.44187
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Neuraxial anesthesia, compared to general anesthesia, offers better patient comfort, early ambulation, and discharge with excellent post-operative pain relief for short gynecological procedures. Recently chloroprocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic agent became available for intrathecal use. This study aimed to compare intrathecal chloroprocaine with bupivacaine in short gynecological procedures. Methodology Consecutive patients undergoing short gynecological procedures, patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II, between 18 and 60 years of age, and patients with a height between 150 cm and 180 cm were included in the study. Randomization was done using a computer-generated random number table. Patients were allocated to one of the two study groups. Group B received 4 mL of isobaric bupivacaine (0.25%) 10 mg intrathecal, and Group C received 4 mL of isobaric chloroprocaine (1%) 40 mg intrathecal. The primary outcome criteria were time to ambulation and discharge readiness. The secondary outcome criteria were onset, duration, and intensity of sensory and motor blockade, time to voiding, and any adverse effects. Results Patients receiving chloroprocaine had a significantly (p=0.001) faster time (158 +/- 31 min) to ambulation compared to bupivacaine (241 +/- 23 min). The regression of sensory blockade was substantially faster (p=0.001) with chloroprocaine (60 +/- 13 min) than with bupivacaine (94 +/- 24 min). Mean time to motor onset was significantly (p=0.05) faster in chloroprocaine (8 +/- 3 min) than bupivacaine (12 +/- 3 min) group. Significantly faster (p=0.001) recovery of motor blockade was observed with chloroprocaine (130 +/- 32 min) than bupivacaine (211 +/- 22 min). The time to first voiding was also significantly earlier with stable hemodynamics and no adverse effects in chloroprocaine group. Conclusion Intrathecal chloroprocaine may be an attractive alternative and is superior to isobaric bupivacaine as it provides early ambulation and discharge readiness for daycare anesthesia in short gynecological procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Alley Elizabeth A, 2014, Anesthesiol Clin, V32, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.anclin.2014.02.007
[2]   Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: a prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial [J].
Camponovo, C. ;
Wulf, H. ;
Ghisi, D. ;
Fanelli, A. ;
Riva, T. ;
Cristina, D. ;
Vassiliou, T. ;
Leschka, K. ;
Fanelli, G. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 58 (05) :560-566
[3]   A POST-ANESTHETIC DISCHARGE SCORING SYSTEM FOR HOME READINESS AFTER AMBULATORY SURGERY [J].
CHUNG, F ;
CHAN, VWS ;
ONG, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (06) :500-506
[4]   The use of 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anaesthesia [J].
Goldblum, E. ;
Atchabahian, A. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 57 (05) :545-552
[5]  
Hozo SP, 2005, BMC Med Res Methodol, V5, P13, DOI [10/dt5pn6, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13]
[6]   Use of spinal anaesthesia in day surgery [J].
Korhonen, Anna-Maija .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 19 (06) :612-616
[7]  
Lacasse MA, 2011, CAN J ANESTH, V58, P384, DOI 10.1007/s12630-010-9450-x
[8]   Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Saporito, Andrea ;
Ceppi, Marcello ;
Perren, Andreas ;
La Regina, Davide ;
Cafarotti, Stefano ;
Borgeat, Alain ;
Aguirre, Jose ;
Van de Velde, Marc ;
Teunkens, An .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2019, 52 :99-104
[9]   Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy in an Outpatient Setting A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Teunkens, An ;
Vermeulen, Kristien ;
Van Gerven, Elke ;
Fieuws, Steffen ;
Van de Velde, Marc ;
Rex, Steffen .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (05) :576-583
[10]   Selective spinal anesthesia for outpatient transurethral prostatectomy (TURP): randomized controlled comparison of chloroprocaine with lidocaine [J].
Vaghadia, H. ;
Neilson, G. ;
Lennox, P. H. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 56 (02) :217-223