LEAP: Scaling Numerical Optimization Based Synthesis Using an Incremental Approach

被引:15
作者
Smith, Ethan [1 ]
Davis, Marc Grau [1 ]
Larson, Jeffrey [2 ]
Younis, Ed [3 ]
Oftelie, Lindsay Bassman [3 ]
Lavrijsen, Wim [3 ]
Iancu, Costin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, 110 Sproul Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, 9700 S Cass Ave, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON QUANTUM COMPUTING | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
Gate-based quantum computing; Quantum circuit synthesis;
D O I
10.1145/3548693
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
While showing great promise, circuit synthesis techniques that combine numerical optimization with search over circuit structures face scalability challenges due to a large number of parameters, exponential search spaces, and complex objective functions. The LEAP algorithm improves scaling across these dimensions using iterative circuit synthesis, incremental reoptimization, dimensionality reduction, and improved numerical optimization. LEAP draws on the design of the optimal synthesis algorithm QSearch by extending it with an incremental approach to determine constant prefix solutions for a circuit. By narrowing the search space, LEAP improves scalability from four to six qubit circuits. LEAP was evaluated with known quantum circuits such as QFT and physical simulation circuits like the VQE, TFIM, and QITE. LEAP can compile four qubit unitaries up to 59x faster than QSearch and five and six qubit unitaries with up to 1.2x fewer CNOTs compared to the QFAST package. LEAP can reduce the CNOT count by up to 36x, or 7x on average, compared to the CQC Tket compiler. Despite its heuristics, LEAP has generated optimal circuits for many test cases with a priori known solutions. The techniques introduced by LEAP are applicable to other numerical optimization based synthesis approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Agarwal S., 2022, Ceres Solver
[2]  
Al-Ta'ani Ola, 2015, Quantum circuit synthesis using Solovay-Kitaev algorithm and optimization techniques
[3]  
Amy M, 2018, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1601.07363
[4]   A Meet-in-the-Middle Algorithm for Fast Synthesis of Depth-Optimal Quantum Circuits [J].
Amy, Matthew ;
Maslov, Dmitri ;
Mosca, Michele ;
Roetteler, Martin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2013, 32 (06) :818-830
[5]  
Nagy AB, 2006, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:quant-ph/0606077
[6]  
Bassman L., 2021, arXiv
[7]   Towards simulation of the dynamics of materials on quantum computers [J].
Bassman, Lindsay ;
Liu, Kuang ;
Krishnamoorthy, Aravind ;
Linker, Thomas ;
Geng, Yifan ;
Shebib, Daniel ;
Fukushima, Shogo ;
Shimojo, Fuyuki ;
Kalia, Rajiv K. ;
Nakano, Aiichiro ;
Vashishta, Priya .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2020, 101 (18)
[8]   Resource-Optimal Single-Qubit Quantum Circuits [J].
Bocharov, Alex ;
Svore, Krysta M. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2012, 109 (19)
[9]   Quantum advantage with shallow circuits [J].
Bravyi, Sergey ;
Gosset, David ;
Koenig, Robert .
SCIENCE, 2018, 362 (6412) :308-+
[10]  
Bullock SS, 2003, DES AUT CON, P324