How to Define Pediatric Flatfoot: Comparison of 2 Methods: Foot Posture in Static and Dynamic Conditions in Children 5 to 9 Years Old

被引:4
作者
Boryczka-Trefler, Anna [1 ]
Kalinowska, Malgorzata [1 ]
Szczerbik, Ewa [1 ]
Stepowska, Jolanta [1 ]
Lukaszewska, Anna [1 ]
Syczewska, Malgorzata [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Mem Hlth Inst, Dept Rehabil, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Childrens Mem Hlth Inst, Dept Rehabil, Al Dzieci Polskich 20, PL-04730 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
flatfoot; children; statics; dynamics; FLEXIBLE FLATFOOT;
D O I
10.1177/1938640021991345
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Flexible flatfoot is the most common posture deformity among children. There are many diagnostic techniques to identify it, from clinical observation to measurements and imaging techniques, both in static and in dynamic conditions, but their reliability, validity, and accuracy are still unproven. The static and dynamic conditions differ; thus, the aim was to compare the results of the evaluation of flatfeet in 50 children (5-9 years of age) in both conditions: standing versus gait. Static evaluation. Comparison of the footprints (Harris and Beath pedograph) with the Clarke's footprinting graphics. Dynamic evaluation. On the same day, all children underwent pedobarography during gait. Geometric measures of the feet (midfoot width, instep width, instep, foot width) were calculated together with the Arch Index. In the static condition, 87 of 100 were classified as a flatfoot, whereas during walking, there were just 56 feet classified as flat. So 35 feet classified on the basis of the clinical examination and Clarke's footprint chart as flatfeet, according to the Arch Index calculated during walking were not flat, and 4 feet classified on the basis of Clarke's footprint chart as normal according to the Arch Index were flat.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, PED FLATF
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, NOVEL SCI MED MANUAL
  • [3] Bac A, 2008, FAM MED PRIM CARE RE, V10, P1278
  • [4] Paediatric flexible flat foot: how are we measuring it and are we getting it right? A systematic review
    Banwell, Helen A.
    Paris, Maisie E.
    Mackintosh, Shylie
    Williams, Cylie M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2018, 11
  • [5] Foot deformation during walking: differences between static and dynamic 3D foot morphology in developing feet
    Barisch-Fritz, Bettina
    Schmeltzpfenning, Timo
    Plank, Clemens
    Grau, Stefan
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2014, 57 (06) : 921 - 933
  • [6] Development of healthy children's feet-Nine-year results of a longitudinal investigation of plantar loading patterns
    Bosch, Kerstin
    Gerss, Joachim
    Rosenbaum, Dieter
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2010, 32 (04) : 564 - 571
  • [7] THE ARCH INDEX - A USEFUL MEASURE FROM FOOTPRINTS
    CAVANAGH, PR
    RODGERS, MM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1987, 20 (05) : 547 - 551
  • [8] An investigation of the factors affecting flatfoot in children with delayed motor development
    Chen, Kun-Chung
    Tung, Li-Chen
    Tung, Chien-Hung
    Yeh, Chih-Jung
    Yang, Jeng-Feng
    Wang, Chun-Hou
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 35 (03) : 639 - 645
  • [9] The effectiveness of non-surgical intervention (Foot Orthoses) for paediatric flexible pes planus: A systematic review: Update
    Dars, Sindhrani
    Uden, Hayley
    Banwell, Helen A.
    Kumar, Saravana
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [10] Evans AM, 2011, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V47, P69