How heuristic cues impact crowdfunding performance: The moderating role of platform competition intensity and platform demand potential

被引:6
作者
Zhu, Zujun [1 ]
Huang, Qian [2 ]
Liu, Hefu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, 96 Jinzhai Rd, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Int Inst Finance, 96 Jinzhai Rd, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Crowdfunding; Heuristic cues; Platform competition intensity; Platform demand potential; SIGNALING THEORY; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; DECISION-MAKING; ONLINE REVIEWS; VISUAL CUES; PROPENSITY; BRAND; CONSUMER; FIELD; USER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113797
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Crowdfunding is an emerging financial channel for entrepreneurs to finance ventures. Nevertheless, the funding success rates of reward-based crowdfunding projects are low, apparently due to information asymmetries be-tween entrepreneurs and potential investors. Using heuristic cues to improve crowdfunding performance has attracted increasing attention from both scholars and practitioners. To expand understanding of the role of heuristic cues in crowdfunding, the current study explores how platform contextual factors leverage the effect of heuristic cues on crowdfunding performance. This study analyzed 6363 projects on the Jingdong crowdfunding platform and found that the performance benefits of heuristic cues were substantially contingent on platform competition intensity and platform demand potential. The results provide empirical evidence that platform competition intensity can weaken the heuristics-performance relationship, while platform demand potential can strengthen it. These findings extend current conceptions of the relationship between signals and performance in signaling theory and the crowdfunding literature.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Consumer, brand, celebrity: Which congruency produces effective celebrity endorsements?
    Albert, Noel
    Ambroise, Laure
    Valette-Florence, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 81 : 96 - 106
  • [2] The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance
    Anglin, Aaron H.
    Short, Jeremy C.
    Drover, Will
    Stevenson, Regan M.
    McKenny, Aaron F.
    Allison, Thomas H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2018, 33 (04) : 470 - 492
  • [3] An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies
    Austin, Peter C.
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) : 399 - 424
  • [4] Gender Gaps in Equity Crowdfunding: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment
    Bapna, Sofia
    Ganco, Martin
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (05) : 2679 - 2710
  • [5] Dynamics of Lending-Based Prosocial Crowdfunding: Using a Social Responsibility Lens
    Berns, John P.
    Figueroa-Armijos, Maria
    da Motta Veiga, Serge P.
    Dunne, Timothy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 161 (01) : 169 - 185
  • [6] The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding
    Bi, Sheng
    Liu, Zhiying
    Usman, Khalid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 71 : 10 - 18
  • [7] How online advertising competes with user-generated content in TripAdvisor. A neuroscientific approach
    Bigne, Enrique
    Simonetti, Aline
    Ruiz, Carla
    Kakaria, Shobhit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 123 : 279 - 288
  • [8] Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation?
    Block, Joern
    Hornuf, Lars
    Moritz, Alexandra
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (01) : 3 - 27
  • [9] Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage
    Boudreau, Kevin J.
    Jeppesen, Lars B.
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (12) : 1761 - 1777
  • [10] Digital platform openness: Drivers, dimensions and outcomes
    Broekhuizen, T. L. J.
    Emrich, O.
    Gijsenberg, M. J.
    Broekhuis, M.
    Donkers, B.
    Sloot, L. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 122 : 902 - 914