Symbolic threat from the West, belief in pro-Kremlin conspiracy theories, and attribution of blame for the war in Ukraine: A two-wave longitudinal study

被引:6
作者
Srol, Jakub [1 ]
Cavojova, Vladimira [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Expt Psychol, Ctr Social & Psychol Sci, Dubravska Cesta 9, Bratislava 84104, Slovakia
关键词
conspiracy beliefs; intergroup threat; motivated reasoning; symbolic threat from the West; war in Ukraine;
D O I
10.1111/pops.12975
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In this two-wave longitudinal study, we examined the sense of symbolic threat from the West and Russia as ideological roots of motivated belief in pro-Kremlin conspiracy theories and the attribution of blame to Russia, the United States, and Ukraine for the war in Ukraine. Participants (N=690) completed questionnaires on symbolic threat from the West and Russia, belief in pro-Kremlin conspiracy theories about the war in Ukraine as well as generic anti-West and anti-Russian conspiracy theories, and blame for the war in Ukraine. The sense of symbolic threat from the West and pro-Kremlin conspiracy beliefs predicted each other in time and were substantially associated with increased blaming of Ukraine and the United States for the war in Ukraine. Conversely, symbolic threat from Russia along with the rejection of pro-Kremlin conspiracy theories predicted increased blaming of Russia over time. Motivated reasoning analyses suggested that the ideological link between the symbolic threat from the West and belief in anti-West conspiracy theories was stronger than the one between symbolic threat from Russia and belief in anti-Russian conspiracy theories. This suggests an existence of self-reinforcing relationship between the deep-rooted sense of symbolic threat and anti-West conspiracy theories which is exploited by various political actors.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 103
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Of precarity and conspiracy: Introducing a socio-functional model of conspiracy beliefs [J].
Adam-Troian, Jais ;
Chayinska, Maria ;
Paladino, Maria Paola ;
Ulug, Ozden Melis ;
Vaes, Jeroen ;
Wagner-Egger, Pascal .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 62 :136-159
[2]  
BBC News, 2022, BBC NEWS
[3]   Ideology and the promotion of social change [J].
Becker, Julia C. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2020, 34 :6-11
[4]   The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks [J].
Boutyline, Andrei ;
Willer, Robb .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 (03) :551-569
[5]  
Browne M., 2022, The New York Times
[6]   Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire [J].
Bruder, Martin ;
Haffke, Peter ;
Neave, Nick ;
Nouripanah, Nina ;
Imhoff, Roland .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[7]   Conspiracy theories and social media platforms [J].
Cinelli, Matteo ;
Etta, Gabriele ;
Avalle, Michele ;
Quattrociocchi, Alessandro ;
Di Marco, Niccolo ;
Valensise, Carlo ;
Galeazzi, Alessandro ;
Quattrociocchi, Walter .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 47
[8]   Belief in a Dangerous World Does Not Explain Substantial Variance in Political Attitudes, But Other World Beliefs Do [J].
Clifton, Jeremy D. W. ;
Kerry, Nicholas .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2023, 14 (05) :515-525
[9]  
Debiec K., 2022, OSW Centre for Eastern Studies
[10]   Understanding Conspiracy Theories [J].
Douglas, Karen M. ;
Uscinski, Joseph E. ;
Sutton, Robbie M. ;
Cichocka, Aleksandra ;
Nefes, Turkay ;
Ang, Chee Siang ;
Deravi, Farzin .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 40 :3-35