Effectiveness of deep learning reconstruction on standard to ultra-low-dose high-definition chest CT images

被引:10
|
作者
Hamabuchi, Nayu [1 ]
Ohno, Yoshiharu [2 ,3 ]
Kimata, Hirona [4 ]
Ito, Yuya [4 ]
Fujii, Kenji [4 ]
Akino, Naruomi [4 ]
Takenaka, Daisuke [1 ,5 ]
Yoshikawa, Takeshi [1 ,5 ]
Oshima, Yuka [1 ]
Matsuyama, Takahiro [1 ]
Nagata, Hiroyuki [3 ]
Ueda, Takahiro [1 ]
Ikeda, Hirotaka [1 ]
Ozawa, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Toyama, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake Cho, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[2] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sch Med, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[3] Fujita Hlth Univ, Joint Res Lab Adv Med Imaging, Sch Med, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[4] Canon Med Syst Corp, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan
[5] Hyogo Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Lung; CT; Radiation dose; Iterative reconstruction; Deep learning reconstruction; RESOLUTION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; REDUCTION; FEASIBILITY; TERMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-023-01470-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeDeep learning reconstruction (DLR) has been introduced by major vendors, tested for CT examinations of a variety of organs, and compared with other reconstruction methods. The purpose of this study was to compare the capabilities of DLR for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation with those of hybrid-type iterative reconstruction (IR) for standard-, reduced- and ultra-low-dose CTs (SDCT, RDCT and ULDCT) obtained with high-definition CT (HDCT) and reconstructed at 0.25-mm, 0.5-mm and 1-mm section thicknesses with 512 x 512 or 1024 x 1024 matrixes for patients with various pulmonary diseases.Materials and methodsForty age-, gender- and body mass index-matched patients with various pulmonary diseases underwent SDCT (CT dose index volume : mean & PLUSMN; standard deviation, 9.0 & PLUSMN; 1.8 mGy), RDCT (CTDIvol: 1.7 & PLUSMN; 0.2 mGy) and ULDCT (CTDIvol: 0.8 & PLUSMN; 0.1 mGy) at a HDCT. All CT data set were then reconstructed with 512 x 512 or 1024 x 1024 matrixes by means of hybrid-type IR and DLR. SNR of lung parenchyma and probabilities of all lung textures were assessed for each CT data set. SNR and detection performance of each lung texture reconstructed with DLR and hybrid-type IR were then compared by means of paired t tests and ROC analyses for all CT data at each section thickness.ResultsData for each radiation dose showed DLR attained significantly higher SNR than hybrid-type IR for each of the CT data (p < 0.0001). On assessments of all findings except consolidation and nodules or masses, areas under the curve (AUCs) for ULDCT with hybrid-type IR for each section thickness (0.91 & LE; AUC & LE; 0.97) were significantly smaller than those with DLR (0.97 & LE; AUC & LE; 1, p < 0.05) and the standard protocol (0.98 & LE; AUC & LE; 1, p < 0.05).ConclusionDLR is potentially more effective for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation than hybrid-type IR on all radiation dose CTs obtained at HDCT and reconstructed with each section thickness with both matrixes for patients with a variety of pulmonary diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:1373 / 1388
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Value of ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction for selected emergency room patients with acute dyspnea
    Macri, Francesco
    Greffier, Joel
    Pereira, Fabricio
    Rosa, Alina Chica
    Khasanova, Elina
    Claret, Pierre-Geraut
    Larbi, Ahmed
    Gualdi, Gianfranco
    Beregi, Jean Paul
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (09) : 1637 - 1644
  • [22] Combined Low-dose Simulation and Deep Learning for CT Denoising: Application of Ultra-low-dose Cardiac CTA
    Ahn, Chul Kyun
    Jin, Hyeongmin
    Heo, Changyong
    Kim, Jong Hyo
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 10948
  • [23] Deep learning-based segmentation of ultra-low-dose CT images using an optimized nnU-Net model
    Salimi, Yazdan
    Mansouri, Zahra
    Sun, Chang
    Sanaat, Amirhossein
    Yazdanpanah, Mohammadhossein
    Shooli, Hossein
    Nkoulou, Rene
    Boudabbous, Sana
    Zaidi, Habib
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2025,
  • [24] Model-based iterative reconstruction in ultra-low-dose pediatric chest CT: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction
    Kim, Hae Jin
    Yoo, So-Young
    Jeon, Tae Yeon
    Kim, Ji Hye
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (05) : 1018 - 1022
  • [25] Neural Network Convolution (NNC) for Converting Ultra-Low-Dose to "Virtual" High-Dose CT Images
    Suzuki, Kenji
    Liu, Junchi
    Zarshenas, Amin
    Higaki, Toru
    Fukumoto, Wataru
    Awai, Kazuo
    MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING (MLMI 2017), 2017, 10541 : 334 - 343
  • [26] Lung nodules assessment in ultra-low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction compared to conventional dose CT
    Jin, Shiqi
    Zhang, Bo
    Zhang, Lina
    Li, Shu
    Li, Songbai
    Li, Peiling
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2018, 8 (05) : 480 - 490
  • [27] Iterative Reconstruction for Ultra-Low-Dose Laxative-Free CT Colonography
    Synho Do
    Naeppi, Janne J.
    Yoshida, Hiroyuki
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING: COMPUTATION AND CLINICAL APPLICATIONS, 2013, 8198 : 99 - 106
  • [28] LUNG THORAX - Deep Learning Reconstruction of Low-dose CT Images
    Grawert, Stephanie
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2024, 196 (08): : 783 - 784
  • [29] Deep Learning Improves the Detection of Ultra-Low-Dose CT Scan Parameters in Children with Cystic Fibrosis
    Bayfield, K. J.
    Ram, S.
    Weinheimer, O.
    Fitzpatrick, R.
    Hatt, C.
    Kennedy, B.
    Blaxland, A.
    Caplain, N.
    Wielputz, M.
    Yu, L.
    Robinson, T. E.
    Bartholmai, B. J.
    Fitzgerald, D. A.
    Selvadurai, H.
    Galban, C. J.
    Robinson, P. D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [30] Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT in detection of chest pathology: a systematic review
    Taekker, Maria
    Kristjansdottir, Bjorg
    Graumann, Ole
    Laursen, Christian B.
    Pietersen, Pia, I
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 74 : 139 - 148