Emerging modes of digitalisation in the delivery of welfare-to-work: Implications for street-level discretion

被引:18
作者
Ball, Sarah [1 ]
McGann, Michael [1 ]
Nguyen, Phuc [2 ]
Considine, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
artificial intelligence; automation; digitalisation; street-level bureaucracy; welfare-to-work; PROVISION; COERCION;
D O I
10.1111/spol.12939
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Countries are increasingly looking to 'digitalise' how public services are delivered, with welfare-to-work and public employment services being key sites of reform. It is hoped that digitalisation can achieve efficient, effective, and targeted services for those in need and there is now a growing body of research on both the opportunities and pitfalls associated with this transition to digital welfare states. However, as a concept, 'digitalisation' remains ambiguously defined, hindering understanding of the distinct ways that discrete technological innovations are reshaping citizens' access to social protection and the role of street-level discretion in welfare administration. Drawing on interviews with expert informants from three countries pioneering digital reforms, this study aims to better understand what digitalisation entails for the delivery of activation. We identify three discrete modes of 'digitalisation' in welfare-to-work programmes: virtual engagement (remote activation), transactional automation (self-activation), and digital triaging (targeted activation). Far from digitalisation heralding the automation and curtailment of frontline discretion, the different modes reshape frontline delivery and citizens' access to social protection in specific ways.
引用
收藏
页码:1166 / 1180
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]   Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government [J].
Buffat, Aurelien .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 17 (01) :149-161
[12]   Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and Bureaucracy [J].
Bullock, Justin B. .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 49 (07) :751-761
[13]   Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion [J].
Busch, Peter Andre ;
Henriksen, Helle Zinner .
INFORMATION POLITY, 2018, 23 (01) :3-28
[14]   Towards digital dole parole: A review of digital self-service initiatives in Australian employment services [J].
Casey, Simone Jane .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2022, 57 (01) :111-124
[15]   Digital welfare: designing for more nuanced forms of access [J].
Coles-Kemp, Lizzie ;
Ashenden, Debi ;
Morris, Amelia ;
Yuille, Jeremy .
POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE, 2020, 3 (02) :177-188
[16]   Disrupting the Welfare State? Digitalisation and the Retrenchment of Public Sector Capacity [J].
Collington, Rosie .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, 27 (02) :312-328
[17]   Can Robots Understand Welfare? Exploring Machine Bureaucracies in Welfare-to-Work [J].
Considine, Mark ;
Mcgann, Michael ;
Ball, Sarah ;
Nguyen, Phuc .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2022, 51 (03) :519-534
[18]   Datafication and the Welfare State [J].
Dencik, Lina ;
Kaun, Anne .
GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 1 (01)
[19]  
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), 2023, INTR OUR DIG FUT
[20]   Using Artificial Intelligence to classify Jobseekers: The Accuracy-Equity Trade-off [J].
Desiere, Sam ;
Struyven, Ludo .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2021, 50 (02) :367-385